Abstract
Instructional design is a system of procedures used for developing instruction and training curricula in a consistent and reliable method. This 5-page publication applies the best practices of instructional design using the Dick and Carey systems approach. Written by Tyler D’Angelo, J. C. Bunch, and Andrew Thoron and published by the UF/IFAS Department of Agricultural Education and Communication, March 2018.
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/wc294
Accessibility Summary:
In accordance with Title II regulations this content meets all points of exemption as Archived web content and/or Preexisting conventional electronic documents.
References
Borich, G. (1979). Implications for developing teacher competencies from process-product research Journal of Teacher Education, 30(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717903000136
Branch, R. (1996). Instructional design as a response to the complexities of instruction. In N. Venkataiah (Ed.), Educational technology (pp. 21-49). New Delhi: S. B. Nangia for APH Publishing Corporation.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York, New York: David McKay Co Inc.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Reiser, R. A., Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2011). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson.
Articles in the EDIS journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, and are available to share and distribute for any noncommercial purpose with attribution. This license does not apply to the use of individual images in the article.
