Understanding Metrics for Communicating the Economic Importance of Florida’s Fisheries Part II: Quantifying Market Activity
EDIS Cover Volume 2025 Number 1 cucumber flower image
View on Ask IFAS
PDF 2025

Keywords

impact
contribution
activity
economic valuation
market analysis
markets

Categories

How to Cite

Botta, Robert, Christa D. Court, Andrew Ropicki, and Edward V. Camp. 2025. “Understanding Metrics for Communicating the Economic Importance of Florida’s Fisheries Part II: Quantifying Market Activity: FA266, 10 2024”. EDIS 2025 (1). Gainesville, FL. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fa266-2024.

Abstract

Florida’s fish and fisheries are vital to the state’s economy, but often people want or need to know just how economically important they are. However, “economic importance” means different things depending on what economic approaches are used. Understanding these differences is important for discussing the economic importance of fisheries and how they might be affected by management actions or environmental changes. This publication is the second part in a three-part series that summarizes different types of economic metrics and how they are often used in a fisheries context. The first publication in the series, , provides an overview and explains how economic measures can be subdivided into two main groups: 1) those that quantify market activity, and 2) those that measure economic value. This second publication focuses on how regional economic methods are used to quantify market activity. It provides a discussion of the most relevant terms and analyses, as well as a brief discussion of how one might proceed with a regional economic analysis that would provide these types of measures for Florida’s fisheries (and related aspects like aquaculture or coastal resources). This information should help readers, especially management agencies and extension agents, as well as the interested public, better understand the metrics associated with quantifying market activity.

 

 

https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fa266-2024
View on Ask IFAS
PDF 2025

References

Botta, R., J. S. Borsum, E. V. Camp, C. D. Court, and P. Frederick. 2021. “Short-term economic impacts of ecological restoration in estuarine and coastal environments: a case study of Lone Cabbage Reef.” Restoration Ecology 3(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13462

Botta, R., C. D. Court, and E. V. Camp. 2023. “Measuring the Short-Term Economic Impacts of Ecological Restoration” FE1133. EDIS 2023 (2).https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-FE1133-2023

Botta, R., C. D. Court, A. Ropicki, and E. V. Camp. 2021. “Evaluating the regional economic contributions of US aquaculture: Case study of Florida’s shellfish aquaculture industry.” Aquaculture Economics and Management 25 (2): 223–244 https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2020.1869860

Camp, E.V., Court, C.D., Ropicki, A. 2023. “Understanding Metrics for Communicating the Economic Value of Florida’s Fisheries and Coastal Resources” FA260. EDIS 2023 (5).https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fa260-2023

Miller, R., and P. Blair. 2022. Input-Output Analysis Foundations and Extensions (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108676212

Ropicki, A., E. V. Camp, C. D. Court, and R. Botta. 2022. “Understanding Metrics for Communicating the Importance of Florida’s Fisheries: Part III: Measuring Economic Value.” Manuscript in press.

United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA NASS). 2019. 2018 Census of Aquaculture, 2017. Census Agric. 3, AC-17-SS-2.

Watson, P., J. Wilson, D. Thilmany, and S. Winter, S. 2007. “Determining economic contributions and impacts: What is the difference and why do we care?” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 37:140–146.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 UF/IFAS