Streaming Science #3: Using Scientist Online Electronic Field Trips for Engagement with Your Target Audience
view on EDIS


electronic field trip


How to Cite

Loizzo, Jamie, Caroline Barnett, Christine Krebs, and Gabriel Spandau. 2022. “Streaming Science #3: Using Scientist Online Electronic Field Trips for Engagement With Your Target Audience: AEC763/WC424, 12/2022”. EDIS 2022 (6).


This is the third publication in the Streaming Science EDIS series focused on how to use mobile hardware and software for engagement with your target audience. This new 6-page publication of the UF/IFAS Department of Agricultural Education and Communication focuses on a model called Scientist Online for live webcast electronic field trips (EFTs). Through Scientist Online EFTs, Streaming Science connects university scientists and Extension professionals with PK-12 students around the world for small-scale presentations, demonstrations, and discussions. Written by Jamie Loizzo, Caroline Barnett, Christine Krebs, and Gabriel Spandau.
view on EDIS


Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development (pp. 1–60). JAI Press.

Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Vicarious reinforcement and imitative learning. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(6), 601.

Beattie, P. N., Loizzo, J. L., Kent, K. W., Krebs, C. L., Suits, T. E., & Bunch, J. C. (2020). Leveraging Skype in the Classroom for science communication: A Streaming Science – Scientist Online approach. Journal of Applied Communication, 104(3), 1–15.

Kolb, D. (1983). Experiential learning, experiences as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

Krebs, C. L., Loizzo, J. L., Stone, W. A., & Telg, R. W. (2020). Scientist Online: Entomologists’ experiences engaging with school audiences through Skype in the Classroom. Frontiers in Communication—Science and Environmental Communication, 5(576593).

Loizzo, J., Harner, M., Weitzenkamp, D., & Kent, K. (2019). Electronic field trips for science engagement: The Streaming Science model. Journal of Applied Communications, 103(4), 1–11.

Loizzo, J., Krebs, C., & Nickerson, N. (2022). Connection classrooms to natural resource places and faces: Electronic field trips and virtual reality tours. The Agricultural Education Magazine, 95(1), 10–13.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2017). Communicating science effectively: A research agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767–1778.

Reincke, C. M., Bredenoord, A. L., & van Mil, M. H. W. (2020). From deficit to dialogue in science communication. EMBO Reports, 21(9).

Smith, G. A., & Sobel, D. (2010). Place- and community-based education in schools. Routledge.

Copyright (c) 2022 UF/IFAS