Floridian Consumer Perceptions of Local Versus Organic Ornamental Plants
Vol. 2015 No. 3, Historical Fact Sheets
Vol. 2015 No. 3

Floridian Consumer Perceptions of Local Versus Organic Ornamental Plants: FE964/FE964, 4/2015

Historical Fact Sheets
https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fe964-2015
Published 2015-05-06
Hayk Khachatryan
University of Florida
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3103-5236
Alicia Rihn
University of Tennessee
Orange flower
view on EDIS
PDF-2015

Keywords

Organic Industry
Buying Local
Ornamental Plant Nursery Industry

How to Cite

Khachatryan, Hayk, and Alicia Rihn. 2015. “Floridian Consumer Perceptions of Local Versus Organic Ornamental Plants: FE964 FE964, 4 2015”. EDIS 2015 (3). Gainesville, FL:5. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fe964-2015.
APA Chicago IEEE MLA

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

Horticultural consumers in Florida are interested in local and organically produced plants. But these terms can mean different things in different regions. UF/IFAS researchers conducted a survey last summer which suggests that consumers in central Florida define local as plants that are grown near where they are sold and identify the most important local benefits as product safety, quality, and community support. Organic plants are perceived as requiring fewer chemical additives and being healthier for the environment. The importance of these traits varies by plant type. This 5-page fact sheet was written by Hayk Khachatryan and Alicia Rihn, and published by the UF Department of Food and Resource Economics, April 2015.

FE964/FE964: Floridian Consumer Perceptions of Local Versus Organic Ornamental Plants (ufl.edu)

https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fe964-2015
view on EDIS
PDF-2015

References

Campbell, B., H. Khachatryan, B.K. Behe, J.H. Dennis, and C.R. Hall. 2014. US and Canadian consumer perceptions of local and organic terminology. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 17:21-40.

Harris, W., B. Lubben, J. Novak, and L. Sanders. 2008. The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 summary and consequences. Extension National Farm Bill Train the Trainer Conference, Kansas City, MO.

Hawkins, G., S.E. Burnett, and L.B. Stack. 2012. Survey of consumer interest in organic, sustainable, and local container-grown plants in Maine. HortTechnology 22:817-825. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.22.6.817

Schimmenti, E., A. Galati, V. Borsellino, C. Ievoli, C. Lupi, and S. tinervia. 2013. Behaviour of consumers of conventional and organic flowers and ornamental plants in Italy. Horticultural Science 40:162-171. https://doi.org/10.17221/115/2013-HORTSCI

USDA/AMS. 2014. National Organic Program website. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (USDA/AMS), Washington, D.C. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/nop.

USDA/ERS. 2014. Local Foods. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA/ERS), Washington, D.C. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-markets-prices/local-foods.aspx.

USDA/NASS. 2007. 2007 Census of Agriculture-Greenhouse, Nursery, and Floriculture Operations. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA/NASS), Washington, D.C.

Yiridoe, E.K., S. Bonti-Ankomah, and R.C. Martin. 2005. Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20:193-205. https://doi.org/10.1079/RAF2005113

Yue, C., J.H. Dennis, B.K. Behe, C.R. Hall, B. Campbell, and R.G. Lopez. 2011. Investigating consumer preference for organic, local, or sustainable plants. HortScience 46:610-615. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.46.4.610
License

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>