A Synopsis of US Consumer Perception of Genetically Modified (Biotech) Crops
A microsocpe, model molecules, and cut plant in flask.
view on EDIS

How to Cite

Evans, Edward A., and Fredy H. Ballen. 2013. “A Synopsis of US Consumer Perception of Genetically Modified (Biotech) Crops: FE934, 6/2013”. EDIS 2013 (6). Gainesville, FL. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fe934-2013.


Over the last few decades, the use of modern tools of molecular biology has made it possible to discover, isolate, and introduce several important agricultural traits in cultivated crops. Such improvements are usually accomplished by the technique known as genetic engineering, also known as genetic modification. The aim of this article is to provide an update on recent developments with respect to GM food crops, as well as an assessment of US public opinion with regards to GM foods in general. A successful case of how a US-grown GM crop gained acceptance in one of the strictest fruit importing countries is presented. This 8-page fact sheet was written by Edward A. Evans and Fredy H. Ballen and published by the UF Department of Food and Resource Economics, June 2013.


view on EDIS


Baker, G.A. and T.A. Burnham. 2001. Consumer response to genetically modified foods: Market segment analysis and implications for producers and policy makers. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26: 387-403.

Brookes, G., and Barfoot, P. 2010. Global impact of biotech crops: Environmental effects, 1996-2008. AgBioForum 13(1):76-94.

Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P. 2006. Global impact of biotech crops: Socio-economic and environmental effects in the first ten years of commercial use. AgBioForum, 9(3):139-151.

Carighttoknow.org (California Right to Know). 2012. Get the Facts. http://www.carighttoknow.org/facts.

CBAN (Canadian Biotechnology Action Network). 2012. Resources: Labeling. http://www.cban.ca/Resources/Topics/Labeling.

FAOSTAT 2013. Production data statistics: Crops. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor.

FDA. 1992. Statement of Policy-Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties. United States Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C. http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/Biotechnology/ucm096095.htm.

FDA. 2001. Guidance for Industry: Voluntary Labeling Indicating Whether Foods Have or Have Not Been Developed Using Bioengineering; Draft Guidance. United States Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C. http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm059098.htm.

Federal Register. 1992. Statement of Policy: Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties. Part IX (May 29) United States Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C. Federal Register 57(104):22984-23005.

Fermin, G., R. Keith, J. Suzuki, S. Ferreira, D. Gaskill, K. Pitz, R. Manshardt, D. Gonsalves, and S. Tripathi. 2011. Allergenicity assessment of the papaya ringspot virus coat protein expressed in transgenic Rainbow papaya. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59:10006-10012. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf201194r

Gaskell, G., S. Stares, A. Allansdottir, N. Allum, P. Castro, Y. Esmer, C. Fischler, J. Jackson, N. Kronberger, J. Hample, N. Mejlgaard, A. Quintanilha, A. Rammer, G. Revuelta, P. Stoneman, H. Torgersen, and W. Wagner. 2010. Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010. Winds of Change?

Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_341_winds_en.pdf.

Ganiere, P., W. Chern, and D. Hahn. 2006. A continuum of consumer attitudes toward genetically modified foods in the United States. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 31(1):129-149.

Goldenrice.org. 2013. Golden Rice Project: Golden Rice is part of the solution: Biofortified rice as a contribution to the alleviation of life-threatening micronutrient deficiencies in developing countries. http://www.goldenrice.org/.

Hallman, W.K., W.C. Hebden, H.L. Aquino, C.L. Cuite, and J.T. Lang, J.T. 2003. Public Perceptions of Genetically Modified Foods: A National Study of American Knowledge and Opinion. Food Policy Institute Report Number RR1003-004. Food Policy Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. http://www.foodpolicy.rutgers.edu/docs/pubs/2003_Public_Perceptions_of_Genetically_Modified_Foods.pdf.

Hanrahan, C. 2010. Agricultural biotechnology: The US-EU dispute. Congressional Research Service Reports 69. Washington, D.C.: CRS. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/69.

Heslop, L.A. 2006. If we label it, will they care? The effect of GM-ingredient labeling on consumer responses. Consumer Policy 29(2):203-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-006-9000-7

ISAAA. 2011. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2011. 43-2011. ISAAA Briefs, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA), Manila, Philippines; Narobi, Kenya, Africa; Ithaca, New York, USA. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/43/executivesummary/default.asp.

ISAAA. 2008. Pocket K No. 32: Biotechnology for the Development of Drought Tolerant Crops. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/32/default.asp.

ISAAA. Various Years. Data on GM crops, various years. ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of AgriBiotech Applications), Manila, Philippines; Narobi, Kenya, Africa; Ithaca, New York, USA.

James. C. 2008. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/ GM Crops: 2011. 39-2008. ISAAA Briefs, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA), Manila, Philippines; Narobi, Kenya, Africa; Ithaca, New York, USA. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/39/download/isaaa-brief-39-2008.pdf.

Justlabelit.org (Just Label It). 2012. Right to Know. http://justlabelit.org/right-to-know/.

Li, Q., McCluskey, J., and Wahl, T. 2004. Effects of information on consumers' willingness to pay for GM-corn-fed beef. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 2(2):Article 9. https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-0485.1058

Lin, W., A. Somwaru, F. Tuan, J. Huang, and J. Bai. 2004. Consumer attitudes toward biotech foods in China. Working paper, Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

Macer, D. and M.A. Chen-Ng. 2000. Changing attitudes to biotechnology in Japan. Nature Biotechnology, 18(9):945-947. https://doi.org/10.1038/79425

Moon, W.K. and S.K. Balasubramanian. 2002. Public perceptions and willingness-to-pay a premium for non-GM foods in the US and UK. AgBio-Forum 4(3/4):221-231 (Article 10). http://www.agbioforum.org/v4n34/v4n34a10moon.htm or http://www.agbioforum.org/v4n34/v4n34a10moon.pdf.

Noprop37.com (No on 37). 2012. Stop the Deceptive Food Labeling Scheme. No on 37, Sacramento, CA. http://www.noprop37.com/.

Organic and Non-GMO Report. 2007. US consumers concerned about safety of GM foods. Organic and NonGMO Report (January). http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/jan07/GM_food_safety.php.

Panos Media Briefing. 1999. Greed or Need? Genetically Modified Crops. PMB No. 30A. Panos Media Briefing, London, UK. http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/GMcrops.html.

Pesante, A. 2003. Market Outlook Report: Fresh Papayas. Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Honolulu, HI. http://hawaii.gov/hdoa/add/research-and-outlook-reports/papaya%20outlook%20report.pdf.

Stein, A.J. and E. Rodriguez-Cerezo. 2010. Low-level presence of new GM crops: An issue on the rise for countries where they lack approval. AgBioForum 13(2):173-182.

USDA/ERS. 2012. Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-geneticallyengineered-crops-in-the-us.aspx.

USDA/FAS. 2011. Gain Report: Japan Approved GM papaya. Foreign Agricultural Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Japan%20approved%20GM%20papaya_Tokyo_Japan_12-19-2011.pdf.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.