Conducting the Needs Assessment #9: The Nominal Group Technique
view on EDIS


nominal group technicaue
needs assessment


How to Cite

Bammer, Mary, Matthew Benge, and Laura Warner. 2022. “Conducting the Needs Assessment #9: The Nominal Group Technique: WC410/AEC749, 1/2022”. EDIS 2022 (1).


This ninth publication in the Conducting the Needs Assessment series provides an overview of using the nominal group technique (NGT) to conduct a needs assessment. This document defines the scenarios in which the NGT is suitable, describes the steps involved in conducting the NGT, and provides examples of the use of this technique in Extension. Written by Mary Bammer, Matt Benge, and Laura Warner, and published by the UF/IFAS Department of Agricultural Education and Communication; 5 pp.
view on EDIS


Bammer, M. (2019). Identifying and Assessing the Needs of Florida Commercial Beekeepers Using Nominal Group Technique [Master’s thesis, University of Florida]. University of Florida Theses & Dissertations Collection.

Benge, M., Harder, A., & Carter, H. (2011). Necessary pre-entry competencies as perceived by Florida Extension agents. Journal of Extension, 49(5).

Bitsch, V., Ferris, T., & Lee, K. (2009). Extension teams collecting industry-specific stakeholder input. Journal of Extension, 47(3).

Black, N., Murphy, M., Lamping, D., McKee, M., Sanderson, C., Askham, J., & Marteau, T. (1999). Consensus development methods: A review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 4(4), 236–248.

Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and delphi processes. Scott Foresman & Company.

Delp, P., Thesen, A., Motiwalla, J., & Seshardi, N. (1977). System tools for project planning. International Development Institute.

Dunn, M. A., Vlosky, R. P., & Chavez, A. (2003). A facilitated prioritization process: An application in the forest sector in Honduras. Journal of Extension, 41(1).

Ferrer, M., Jacob, S., & Ferrari, T. M. (2001). Two (or more) heads are better than one: An application of group process to developing Extension evaluation tools. Journal of Extension, 39(5).

Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Chassin, M., & Brook, R. H. (1984). Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use. American Journal of Public Health, 74(9), 979–83.

Manera, K., Hanson, C. S., Gutman, T., & Tong, A. (2019). Consensus methods: Nominal group technique. In Pranee Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, 737–750.

McMillan, S. S., King, M., Tully, M. P. (2016). How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38(3), 655-662.

Murphy, M. K., Black, N. A., Lamping, D. L., McKee, C. M., Sanderson, C. F., Askham, J., & Marteau, T. (1998). Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technology Assessment, 2(3).

Place, N. T. (2007). Using nominal group techniques for helping new Extension agents understand how to effectively involve advisory committee members. Journal of Extension, 45(1).

Poling, R. (2009). The Nominal group technique. University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service.

Robinson, P., & Shepard, R. (2011). Outreach, applied research, and management needs for Wisconsin’s Great Lakes freshwater estuaries: A Cooperative Extension needs assessment model. Journal of Extension, 49(1).

Rogers, E. M., & Cartano, D. G. (1962). Methods of measuring opinion leadership. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 435–441.

Witkin, B. R., & Altschuld, J. W. (1995). Planning and conducting needs assessments: A practical guide. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Copyright (c) 2022 UF/IFAS