Using the TOP Model to Measure Program Performance: A Pocket Reference
EDIS Cover Volume 2009 Number 10 cattle image
view on EDIS
PDF-2009

Keywords

WC092

How to Cite

Harder, Amy. 2009. “Using the TOP Model to Measure Program Performance: A Pocket Reference: WC092/WC092, 12/2009”. EDIS 2009 (10). Gainesville, FL. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-wc092-2009.

Abstract

WC092, a 4-page illustrated fact sheet by Amy Harder, provides an overview of the Targeting Outcomes of Programs (TOP) Model of program planning and evaluation, defines the levels for assessing program performance, and identifies evaluation strategies appropriate for measuring program performance at each level. Includes references. Published by the UF Department of Agricultural Education and Communication, December 2009.

WC092/WC092: Using the TOP Model to Measure Program Performance: A Pocket Reference (ufl.edu)

https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-wc092-2009
view on EDIS
PDF-2009

References

Bennett, C. (1975). Up the hierarchy. Journal of Extension, 13(2), 7-12.

Gall, M D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Israel, G. D. (2006). Elaborating program impacts through data analysis (2nd ed.). Retrieved December 2, 2009, from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pd003.

Israel, G. D. (1992). Phases of data analysis. Retrieved December 2, 2009, from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pd001.

Israel, G. D. (1992). Sampling the evidence of extension program impact. Retrieved December 2, 2009, from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pd005.

Rockwell, K., & Bennett, C. (2004). Targeting outcomes of programs: A hierarchy for targeting outcomes and evaluating their achievement. Faculty publications: Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication Department. Retrieved December 2, 2009, from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/aglecfacpub/48/.

License