Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide information to cotton farmers, Extension agents, and crop consultants about the symptoms of sulfur deficiency, the various sources of sulfur, and its interaction with changing rates of other major nutrients such as nitrogen. Written by Hardeep Singh, Ethan Carter, Lakesh Sharma, Sudeep Sidhu, and Peter Omara, and published by the UF/IFAS Agronomy Department, November 2023.
References
Görmüş, Ö. 2015. “Evaluation of Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization—I.” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 10 (1): 1–7.
Keg River Chemical Corp. 2022. “Keys to Preventing Sulfur Deficiency in Cotton.” https://kegriver.com/keys-to-preventing-sulfur-deficiency-in-cotton/
Mullins, G. L. 1998. “Cotton Response to the Rate and Source of Sulfur on a Sandy Coastal Plain Soil.” Journal of Production Agriculture 11 (2): 214–218. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1998.0214
National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NRSP-3). 2022. NADP Program Office, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, 465 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706. https://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/networks/national-trends-network/
Tucker, M. R. 2000. “Cotton needs sulfur on Coastal Plain soils.” North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services. https://www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/release/5-00agrosulf.htm#:~:text=Cotton%20needs%20from%2015%20to,lint%20production%20under%20most%20circumstances
Wilson, B., G. Stevens, and D. Dunn. 2023. “Sulfur and Boron Fertilization on Cotton.” University of Missouri Extension. https://extension.missouri.edu/publications/g4257
Yin, X., O. Gwathmey, C. Main, and A. Johnson. 2011. “Effects of Sulfur Application Rates and Foliar Zinc Fertilization on Cotton Lint Yields and Qualities.” Agronomy Journal 103 (6): 1794–1803. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0166
Yu, J., X. Yin, T. B. Raper, and S. Jagadamma. 2019. “Sulfur Fertilization and Sulfur Sufficiency Range for Contemporary Cotton Cultivars with High Yielding Potentials.” International Journal of Plant Production 13:369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-019-00061-9