IFAS Assessment of Non-native Plants in Florida's Natural Areas: Status Assessment
Vol. 2010 No. 1, Historical Fact Sheets
Vol. 2010 No. 1

IFAS Assessment of Non-native Plants in Florida's Natural Areas: Status Assessment: SS-AGR-225/AG234, rev. 4/2009

Historical Fact Sheets
https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-ag234-2009
Published 2010-01-31
Alison M. Fox
University of Florida
Doria R. Gordon
University of Florida
Joan A. Dusky
University of Florida
Linda Tyson
Santa Fe Community College
Randall K. Stocker
University of Florida
Kenneth A. Langeland
University of Florida
Aimee L. Cooper
University of Florida
EDIS Cover Volume 2010 Number 1 diabetes test image
PDF-2009

Keywords

AG234

How to Cite

Fox, Alison M., Doria R. Gordon, Joan A. Dusky, Linda Tyson, Randall K. Stocker, Kenneth A. Langeland, and Aimee L. Cooper. 2010. “IFAS Assessment of Non-Native Plants in Florida’s Natural Areas: Status Assessment: SS-AGR-225/AG234, Rev. 4/2009”. EDIS 2010 (1). Gainesville, FL. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-ag234-2009.
APA Chicago IEEE MLA

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

Revised! SS-AGR-225, a 14-page publication by Alison M. Fox, Doria R. Gordon, Joan A. Dusky, Linda Tyson, Randall K. Stocker, Kenneth A. Langeland, and Aimee L. Cooper, is the component of the IFAS Assessment that provides evaluations of plants that currently occur within Florida. designed to identify those non-native plant species that are invasive in areas of Florida where designated management objectives include the conservation of native biodiversity. Includes references. Published by the UF Department of Agronomy, April 2009.

 

https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-ag234-2009
PDF-2009

References

Gordon, D.R. 1998. Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: lessons from Florida. Ecological Applications 8: 975-989. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0975:EOINIP]2.0.CO;2

Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 2008. Predicting Invasive Plants in Florida Using the Australian Weed Risk Assessment. Invasive Plant Science and Management 1: 178-195 https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-07-037.1

Lockwood, J.L., P. Cassey, and T. Blackburn (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.004

Mack, R.N. (2008) Evaluating the credits and debits of a proposed biofuel species: giant reed (Arundo donax). Weed Sci 56: In press https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-08-078.1

Pheloung, P.C, P.A. Williams, and S.R. Halloy. 1999. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental 57: 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0297

Reaser, J.K., L.A. Meyerson, and B. von Holle (2008) Saving camels from straws: how propagule pressure-based prevention policies can reduce the risk of biological invasion. Biol Invasions 10: 1085-1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9186-x

Vitousek, P., L. Loope, C. D'Antonio and S.J. Hassol. 1995. Biological invasions as global change. pp. 213-336 In: S.J. Hassol and J. Katzenberger (eds) Elements of change 1994. Aspen Global Change Institute, Aspen, CO.

License

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>