Keywords
water
FACETS
Floridan Aquifer
agricultural and natural resources communication
OWSK
How to Cite
Abstract
Meaningful engagement by the public in the water decisions that affect their lives requires basic scientific knowledge, such as where their water comes from, the factors that affect quality and availability, and the challenges that influence water supply. A 2020 study suggests that Florida and Georgia residents lack fundamental knowledge about their water resources, including regional water processes, including its challenges, and policies. This is the base information that would enable a person to competently participate in water discussions and make citizen-level voting decisions on topics related to the Floridan aquifer. The knowledge deficits identified in the study are areas on which water communicators can build the public’s water science comprehension and, thereby, support increased public engagement. The findings also suggest the level of water science complexity that the public is equipped to understand.
References
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. The Free Press.
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822380283
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Random House, Inc.
Hundemer, S., & Monroe, M. C. (2020). A co-orientation analysis of producers’ and environmentalists’ mental models of water issues: Opportunities for improved communication and collaboration. Environmental Communication, 15(3), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1828128
Hundemer, S., Monroe, M. C., & Kaplan, D. (2021). The water science communication problem: Water knowledge and the acceptance or rejection of water science. Journal of Hydrology, 604: 127230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127230
Kahan, D. M. (2017). On the sources of ordinary science knowledge and extraordinary science ignorance. In K. H. Jamieson, D. M. Kahan, & D. A. Scheufele (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication (pp. 34–49). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.4
Kahan, D. M., & Braman, D. (2006). Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale Law & Policy Review, 24, Public Law Working Paper No. 87, 147–170.
McCombs, M., & Reynolds, A. (2008). How the news shapes our civic agenda. In M. B. Oliver & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (Third, pp. 1–16). Routledge.
Owens, S. (2000). ‘Engaging the public’: Information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 32(7), 1141–1148. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3330
Sharon, A. J., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2020). Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life? Science Education, 104(5), 873–894. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21581
Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504042690
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 UF/IFAS