Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the economic return on investment for growers using different application rates of Telone II and Temik 15G. Incremental costs per pound of increased lint yield due to nematicide addition, net return per pound of increased lint yield, and partial net return per acre were calculated for treatments (Boehlje and Eidman, 1984). This is EDIS document FE 319, a publication of the Department of Food and Resource Economics, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Published November 2004.
References
Boehlje, M.D., and V.R. Eidman. 1984. Farm Management. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons (pp. 237-238).
Kinloch, R.A., and J.R. Rich. 2000. Florida Cotton Nematode Management Guide. North Florida Research and Eduction Center (NFREC-Quincy) Extension Report 2000-05, Univeristy of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Kinloch, R.A., and R.K. Sprenkel. 1994. Plant-Parasitic Nematodes Associated with Cotton in Florida. Supplement to the Journal of Nematology 26: 749-752.
Rich, J.R., and R.A. Kinloch. 2000. Influence of Temik 15G and Telone II Applications on Cotton Yield and Rotylenchulus reniformis Post-harvest Populations. Nematropica 30: 47-53.
Sprenkel, R.K. 1995. Cotton Production Guidelines. North Florida Research and Education Center (NFREC-Quincy) Extension Report 95-1, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
United States Department of Agriculture, Florida Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-FASS). 2000. http://www.nass.usda.gov/fl/rtoc0cr.htm.
Unless otherwise specified, articles published in the EDIS journal after January 1, 2024 are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.