FACIAL REDUCTION ACROSS THREE REPRESENTATIVE TAXA: A GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRIC APPROACH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32473/nfja.3.2.131120Keywords:
Morphology, Anatomy, Comparative AnatomyAbstract
Facial reduction is a phenomenon described extensively in the evolutionary, clinical, and veterinary literature. Despite the fact that this phenomenon applies to a variety of species and can even be found in the clinical medical and veterinary literature (midfacial hypoplasia, craniosynostosis conditions, etc.), it has not been analyzed comprehensively using a geometric morphometric approach. The goal of this study was to improve our understanding of facial reduction as both an evolutionary process and as the result of selective breeding. Three representative taxa (bats, primates, and dogs) were selected for this project for their presence of both a normocephalic and brachycephalic morphotype. Bats and primates evolved their facial reduction as the result of natural selection and other evolutionary processes over a long period of time with a large amount of genetic diversity. Dogs, on the other hand, developed their squished-face morphotype over the space of a few thousand years. Despite this fact, dogs have been proposed as a model for evolutionary facial reduction. Although dogs were able to achieve similar—if not more pronounced—facial reduction, they did so in a completely different way than bats and dogs.
This project included the analysis of specific patterns of localized shape change across these representative three taxa. The impact of this facial reduction on the soft tissue structures of the skull—namely, the brain—was assessed through the study of canine endocasts. We analyzed all three taxa through the analysis of six previously-established modules. These modules include the six main areas proposed by Goswami (2006): face, orbit, oral, zygomatic, cranial vault and cranial base. Modularity and integration were evaluated for these modules in order to better understand the constraints present during facial reduction. Finally, both global and modular facial reduction were analyzed in the three representative taxa using geometric morphometric analysis. Despite being proposed as a model of evolutionary facial reduction, dogs demonstrate major differences in cranial morphology as the result of selective breeding processes. Furthermore, facial reduction that is the result of evolutionary processes is not consistent between bats and primates, and instead, bats share much of their cranial morphology in common with dogs. Overall, it is clear that facial reduction is a multi-faceted morphological phenomenon of evolutionary significance.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Molly Chisholm Selba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting to the New Florida Journal of Anthropology, the author(s) agree to the terms of the Author Agreement. All authors retain copyrights associated with their article contributions and agree to make such contributions available under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license upon publication.
Florida OJ Author Agreement (University of Florida)
The following agreement takes effect upon acceptance of the Submission (“Submission”) for publication in the New Florida Journal of Anthropology:
I hereby grant to the University of Florida (“the University”) the non-exclusive right to retain, reproduce and distribute the Submission in whole or in part, in print and electronic format and in any medium. This agreement does not represent a transfer of copyright to the University.
The University may make and keep multiple copies of the work for purposes of security, backup, preservation and access; and may migrate the work to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation and access.
I represent and warrant to the University that the work is my original work and that I have the authority as sole author or I have the authority on behalf of my co-authors to grant the rights contained in this agreement. I also represent that the work does not, to the best of my knowledge, infringe or violate any rights of others.
I further represent and warrant that I have obtained all necessary rights to permit the University to reproduce and distribute the work, including any third-party material. Alternatively, I represent that my use of any third-party material is allowed because the material is not in copyright or I have performed a fair use analysis and reasonably believe my use is permitted. Any content owned by a third party is clearly identified and acknowledged within the work.
I grant these same rights to New Florida Journal of Anthropology. Additionally, I grant the right to both the University and New Florida Journal of Anthropology to enter into agreements with third-party entities and the rights necessary to host, print, index and abstract the Submission.
Open Access and Self-Archiving
The New Florida Journal of Anthropology follows an open-access publishing model, meaning that all articles will be publicly accessible on the Internet immediately upon publication.Authors may share the submitted manuscript (preprint) of the Submission on the Internet at any point before or after publication, with a citation and link to the final version of record to be added as soon as the issue is available. The author may disseminate the final peer-reviewed version at any point after publication.
Creative Commons License
The New Florida Journal of Anthropology applies a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license to encourage sharing and reuse of content and to maximize the impact of published research. By publishing in the New Florida Journal of Anthropology, authors agree that the terms of this license will be applied to the Submission. The George A. Smathers Libraries at the University of Florida (copyright@uflib.ufl.edu) may be able to offer additional information.
By granting this license, authors acknowledge that they have read and agreed to the terms of this agreement.