Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • You have submitted all supplemental documentation, including a list of potential peer-reviewers.
  • You have included a tweetable summary of your submission.
  • If applicable (Research Articles and Ethnographic Films), you have included a list of possible reviewers and potential conflicts.

Author Guidelines

Submission to NFJA implies that the content has not been published in elsewhere, except in cases of scientific meetings or symposiums. Please feel free to reach out to nfja@anthro.ufl.edu with any questions regarding submissions.

SUBJECT MATTER

NFJA accepts submissions relating to all sub-fields of Anthropology and tangentially related fields. These include, but are not limited to, History, Biology, Sociology, Geology, Linguistics, Women and Gender Studies, as well as regional disciplines (i.e. African Studies). Research that does not directly fall under the discipline of Anthropology must related to humans in some way. NFJA accepts submissions in the form of Articles, Book Reviews, Conference Reviews and Summaries, NFJA Notes, Perspectives in Anthropology, Dissertation and Thesis Abstracts, Photographic Essays, and Ethnographic Films.

AUTHORSHIP AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly used in research and scholarly endeavors. While New Florida Journal of Anthropology recognizes the use and innovation of AI in scholarly endeavors, New Florida Journal of Anthropology prohibits authors from listing AI tools as authors or co-authors as these tools cannot take responsibility for submitted works. Authors who choose to utilize AI tools must be transparent in their use by disclosing the name of the AI tool, how it was used, and the reason for its use. Additionally, AI is prohibited from being listed as a source of information, akin to a book, article, interview, etc. Authors are fully responsible for their submitted works. Additionally, New Florida Journal of Anthropology prohibits editors and peer reviewers from uploading works and any associated files to AI tools for analysis, summarizing, or other purposes. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) holds a similar standard, as seen in their Authorship and AI position statement. Other major publishers such as Sage, Elsevier, Taylor & Francis, etc., follow similar policies.

PEER REVIEW 

Research Articles and Ethnographic films submissions undergo the peer review process. Ethnographic films undergo single-blind peer-review. Research Articles will be subjected to double-blind peer review. Book and Conference Reviews, Dissertation Abstracts, NFJA Notes, and Perspectives in Anthropology are not peer-reviewed and all decisions about their inclusion in the journal are made by the editorial board. When necessary, outside council may be sought by experts in the field to assess suitability for publication.

On the submission page, please include the following in the Peer-Reviewers Components document. Please note that the journal’s editors are not obliged to invite any recommended or opposed reviewers to assess your manuscript.

  • Suggested peer-reviewers for your submission (3-4)
  • List any individuals who you prefer not to review the submission
  • List any individuals who would present a conflict of interest

Recommended reviewers should be an expert in their field and must be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. Please be aware of any potential conflicts of interest when recommending reviewers. Examples of conflicts include, but are not limited to, the following guidelines:

  • The reviewer(s) should not have prior knowledge of your submission.
  • The reviewer(s) should not have collaborated (research, grants, publications, or projects) with any of the authors in the last 5 years.
  • The reviewer(s) should not be from the same institution as any of the authors.
  • The reviewer(s) should not have a personal relationship with any of the authors.

FORMATTING

All written submissions should be 12pt font, Helvetica, single-spaced, with 1-inch margins. American English spelling is preferred. APA 7 citation style is required for both in-text citations and bibliographies. Information about APA 7 can be found here and here. We encourage the use of bias-free language in all submissions. Bibliographic references with DOI’s should be correctly hyperlinked to their DOI source page. In-text citations should be hyperlinked to their corresponding bibliographic entry.

PROMOTION

If your submission is accepted, NFJA may decide to Tweet or blog about it or otherwise promote your work. Please include a Tweetable Summary of no more than 95 characters that conveys the essential message of your submission, as well as a photograph (if you choose) that relates to your research which we will post through the NFJA Twitter to promote your article. 

ARTICLE GUIDELINES

Articles are managed by the Area Editor that most closely aligns with the subject’s subfield. Articles are subjected to double-blind peer review. Articles should be between 3,000-8,000 words, but exceptions can be made when necessary. The organization of the article should generally include an Abstract, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Bibliography when applicable. Figures and tables are encouraged if they contribute to aiding the readers understanding of the material. When necessary, supplemental information can be submitted with the article. 

The submission should be submitted as separate files (Text, Figures and Tables, Tweetable Summary, and Supporting Information). Each figures should not be submitted as a separate file. All figures should be submitted as a single file that is separate from the text. Figure and table files should be accompanied by their respective captioning. Organization in this manner allows the editor to easily format the document for publication. The Text file should include: 

  • Title 
  • Full name(s) of the author(s) 
  • Institutional affiliations 
  • Abstract 
  • Key words (no more than 5)
  • Main text body 
  • Acknowledgements 
  • References 
  • Figure legends 

Figures should be submitted as editable files, not images. Reviewer recommendations/conflicts should be included as a separate text file. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed. To ensure ADA compliance, authors should include the alt-text with the image. More information about alt-text can be found on the American Anthropological Association website.

NON-ENGLISH SUBMISSIONS

NFJA accepts submissions in languages other than English on a case by case basis. Submissions are subject to the same “Article Guidelines” and must be accompanied by an American English translation of the title and abstract. These submissions are subject to the same peer-review process as all other submissions, although the reviewer must be a fluent in academic writing style of the respective language. These are managed by the relevant Area Editor in conjunction with the DEIA Editor. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

UNDERGRADUATE SUBMISSIONS GUIDELINES 

Undergraduate submissions are subject to the same "Article Guidelines" and double-blind peer-review processes specified above. Undergraduates are not permitted to submit articles as a single author. They must have a co-author that holds a minimum of a master's degree.  Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

CONFERENCE REVIEW GUIDELINES 

Conference Reviews will vary depending on the submission type. Authors may either review a single presentation, an entire session, or an entire conference summary. All should be between 600-2,000 words, although exceptions can be made.

These submissions are not peer-reviewed and final decisions on inclusion in the journal will be made by the editorial board. When necessary, outside council may be sought by experts in the field to assess suitability for publication. Conference submissions are managed by the Review Editor. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

Single presentations or session reviews should include a concise summary of the discussion clearly stating the aims and findings of the research, as well as an overview of the methodology employed. It should also include a review of the broader impact the research might have. Finally, it should include the authors own opinion on the research presented.  Possible things to consider: Was the presenter/session organized and knowledgeable on the subject? Was the material presented in concise, meaningful manner? Did the research employ novel methodology? How will the research impact the field at large? Was this research appropriate for the conference in which it was presented?

Conference summaries should clearly state the name, date(s), location, keynote speakers, and focus of the conference. It should cover the main highlights of the conference and any interesting or novel developments in the field which arose. Be sure to summarize the overall thematic events which occurred and any impressions you (and other conference attendees) may have felt. Consider: Was the conference successful?  Where might there be room for improvement in the future? Where there any specific trends in overall research trajectories?

BOOK REVIEW GUIDELINES 

NFJA accepts submissions for book reviews as non-peer review content. They should be between 600-2,000 words, but ideally around 750 words. They should include a statement about the significance of the book, and its central themes, but should not simply summarize the book. Consider the impact the piece of work might have on the respective field of research. Does the author(s) have sound methodology? Are there gaps in the knowledge or problematic writing styles? Does this work have the ability to serve not only academic realms but reach out to boarder audiences? These are just suggestions for things to consider, but feel free to expand on any avenue which you feel fits best with your review.

Book reviews are managed by the Review Editor. These are not peer-reviewed submissions, thus their inclusion in the journal is determined by the editorial board. When necessary, outside council may be sought by experts in the field to assess suitability for publication. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

THESIS/DISSERTATION ABSTRACTS 

They must be from an officially accepted dissertation. These submissions are not peer-reviewed and final decisions on its inclusion in the journal will be made by the editorial board. When necessary, outside council may be sought by experts in the field to assess suitability for publication. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed. Thesis and dissertation abstracts are managed by the Review Editor.

Submissions must be accompanied by a statement that include 1) the name of the department and university where the thesis/dissertation was submitted, 2) the full and correct name of the author at the time they submitted their thesis/dissertation to the university, 3) the date in which they submitted their thesis/dissertation to the university.

 VIDEO SUBMISSION GUIDELINES

Ethnographic films and videos are defined broadly as works created as the result of ethnographic fieldwork or those which use, are informed by, or illustrate the principles of anthropological theory or methods. Submissions are subject to the peer-review process, considering both their technical merits and their contribution to scholarship.

These submissions are single-blind, where the author does not know the identity of the reviewer, but the reviewers are able to identify the author. These submissions are managed by the Visual Media Editor. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

Submissions should be made electronically through the FOJ website, providing information about the film and the research it is based on. Please include a short abstract of the work as well as a biographical note in the 'bio statement' section of the profile form, listing the role(s) of producer, director, photographer, editor, production assistant, academic advisor, writers, and any other persons of note in the production.

Films should be less than 40 minutes in length, but exceptions may be made for films of exceptional quality. The submission must include a link to the film. You may use a trusted file share service or a video-sharing website, such as Vimeo, Dropbox, or YouTube (hosting platform). Please make sure the film is viewable by anyone with link. If the film is password protected please provide the password in your comments.

PHOTOGRAPHIC ESSAY

Photographic essays are accepted as peer-reviewed submissions. We hope the new section will provide a venue for creative anthropological works that are ethnographic and visual in focus. Photographic essays present a series of images gathered through field research and should reflect the ethnographer’s field site, perspectives in the field, and include descriptions about what is captured within the frame.

Submissions may include 5-20 images, captions of up to 350 words per caption, and up to 2,000 words of introductory text. Text should be 12pt font, Helvetica, single-spaced, with 1-inch margins. American English spelling is preferred. APA 7 citation style is required for both in-text citations and bibliographies. Information about APA 7 can be found here and here. We encourage the use of bias-free language in all submissions. All images are required to have robust and accessible alt-text. Information about accessibility compliance can be found here and here.

PERSPECTIVES IN ANTHROPOLOGY 

Perspectives in Anthropology features short-form essays on social or practical issues that directly face underrepresented scholars within the field, or timely issues in anthropology. Original research is not required for submissions as the intention is to provide a platform for those who wish to communicate their experiences and perspectives in relation to the field of anthropology. Topics can range from the identification of  issues to pathways forward to encourage positive actions for meaningful change. BIPOC and LGBTQI+ individuals are encouraged to submit.

Non-English submissions are welcome, both English and non-English versions will be published. Submissions should be roughly between 500 and 1500 words. Please include a brief summary (< 100 words) of the essay that can be used for promotional purposes (i.e. social media, newsletter).

These submissions are managed by the Perspectives Editor. These submissions are not peer-reviewed and final decisions on its inclusion in the journal will be made by the editorial board. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

NFJA NOTES

NFJA Notes submissions should feature brief discussions of anthropological topics. This submission topic is fairly broad and may include but is not limited to: interesting historical notes, trends or practices in the field, definitions and/or discussion of term usage in the field, intriguing finds, case studies, preliminary findings, et cetera. Submissions must remain under 450 words (titles and references do NOT count toward the total word count) and utilize a maximum of three (3) references. One (1) figure or table may also be used to supplement your short submission but is not required. 

 Your submission should include separate files for a title page, main text body, bibliography, and figure/table (if applicable). The title page should explicitly list the submission title, the full name(s) of the author(s), institutional affiliation(s), acknowledgements, key words (no more than 5), and the total word count. The figure/table should be submitted as an editable file (not an image). 

NFJA Notes are managed by the relevant Area Editor. These submissions are not peer-reviewed and final decisions on its inclusion in the journal will be made by the editorial board. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

EDITORIALS & COMMENTARIES 

Editorials and commentaries are written, generally, by the editorial board, but NFJA also accepts pieces by non-board members. Non-board members should reach out to the field related area editor directly to discuss their proposed submission. The theme or topic to be discussed will be determined by the board. This includes articles, news, reviews, interviews, advances in the field, etc. related to the journal's mission. However, authors are encouraged to contact the editorial board if they have an interest in submitting such content.  These are non-peer-reviewed submissions. For pieces written by outside authors (not members of the editorial board), these submissions will be managed by the relevant Area Editor to determine their suitability for publication. 

REVIEW CRITERIA

All submissions will be assessed for appropriateness to determine their acceptance in NFJA using the following criteria.

  • The submission engages with anthropological method and theory as it relates to the appropriate subfield.
  • The submission presents original research that addresses a question(s) of anthropological interest with new data and/or analyses produced by the author(s).
  • The submission is free of spelling, grammar, punctuation errors.
  • The submission follows all formatting guidelines, including citations.
  • The submission has all relevant components (Introduction, Methods, Results, etc.).
  • The submission is the appropriate length based on the submission type.
  • The main question addressed by the research is relevant and interesting.
  • The topic of the research is original, interesting, and adds to the subject area compared with other published material.
  • The submission is well written and the text is clear and easy to read.
  • The conclusions are consistent with the evidence and arguments presented. They address the main question posed by the author(s).
  • If the author(s) is disagreeing significantly with the current academic consensus, they must make a substantial and credible case.
  • Tables or figures included in the submission aid understanding the author(s) main points.
  • There are no major flaws in the submission (i.e. Drawing a conclusion that is contradicted by the author's own statistical or qualitative evidence. The use of a discredited method. Ignoring a process that is known to have a strong influence on the area under study. Insufficient data. Statistically non-significant variations. Unclear data tables. Contradictory data that either are not self-consistent or disagree with the conclusions. Confirmatory data that adds little, if anything, to current understanding - unless strong arguments for such repetition are made).
  • The title, abstract, and key words are optimized for search purposes (SEO). 

Submission types will be evaluated by the following, in addition to the above criteria.

Ethnographic Films

  • The film engages with ethnographic method and theory.
  • It is the result of fieldwork or is it informed by or illustrates the principles of anthropological theory or methods.
  • Is technically well produced.
  • Contributes to anthropological scholarship at large.
  • If there broader impacts, they are discussed.
  • Includes all relevant components (abstract of the work as well as a biographical note, a list of the role(s) of producer, director, photographer, editor, production assistant, academic advisor, writers, and any other persons of note in the production).
  • The main question addressed by the research is relevant and interesting.
  • If there is text in the film (captions etc.), it should be well written, free of grammatical and spelling errors, clear and easy to read from a visual standpoint. The text should aid the viewer in understanding the research topic.
  • The conclusions are consistent with the evidence and arguments presented.
  • The title and abstract of the film are engaging enough to draw in the intended viewers.
  • The film provides enough cultural and/or historical context for this particular audience to understand the film and its significance both to its original audience and to us in the here and now.
  • The film should have benefit to both the anthropological community at large as well as to the subjects of the film. Consider if there could be potential danger to the subject population by publishing this film.
  • The film’s organization is optimal for presenting the author’s main point. The transitions between frames/subject are adequate but not mechanical or repetitive.
  • The thesis is clear and reasonable, considering the evidence provided. There is enough support to adequately persuade the public of the authors claims about the subject/problem posed.

Conference Reviews

  • The single presentations or session review includes a concise summary of the discussion.
  • It clearly states the aims and findings of the research presented, as well as an overview of the methodology employed.
  • It includes a review of the broader impact the research might have.
  • It addresses if the presenter/session was organized and knowledgeable on the subject.
  • It discusses if the research is appropriate for the conference in which it was presented.

Conference Summaries

  • It includes a concise summary of the entire conference (aims, goals, keynote speakers, etc.).
  • It clearly states the aims and findings of the research, as well as an overview of the methodology employed of interesting talks.
  • It include a review of the broader impact the conference might have.
  • It include the authors own opinion on the research presented.
  • It address if the presenters/sessions/conference was organized and informative to the field at large.

Book Reviews

  • The book fits within the NFJA research scope and asks anthropologically relevant questions.
  • The book engages with anthropological method and theory.
  • The review includes a statement about the significance of the book.
  • The review include a statement about the book’s central themes.
  • The review does not simply summarize the book.
  • The review considers the impact the piece of work might have on the respective field of research.
  • If applicable, does the review discuss possible gaps in the knowledge or problematic writing styles.
  • The review addresses if the book has the ability to serve not only academic realms but reach out to boarder audiences.

Thesis/Dissertation Abstracts

  • The abstract is well written.
  • The abstract provides a good summary of the authors research.
  • The abstract considers the broader impacts of the thesis/dissertation.
  • The dissertation has been officially accepted by the author’s graduate school

Research Posters

  • The poster is submitted in the proper format (as editable PowerPointand PDF files).
  • The images 300 dpi. and are in TIFF or JPG formats.
  • The poster fits within the NFJA research scope and asks anthropologically relevant questions.
  • The main question addressed by the research is it relevant and interesting.
  • The topic is original and adds to the subject area compared with other published material.
  • The text clear and easy to read.
  • The conclusions are consistent with the evidence and arguments presented. They address the main question posed.
  • From a visual standpoint, is the poster aesthetically pleasing. Comparing the text to the background and the images, it is easy to read.
  • The poster has been presented a professional conference.

Perspectives in Anthropology

  • The work focuses on social or practical issues that directly face underrepresented scholars within the field.
  • The work focuses on both issues and pathways forward to encourage positive actions for meaningful change.
  • The author is the appropriate person to write about such subjects.
  • There are no larger underlying issues with the manuscript that need to be addressed.

NFJA Notes

  • The note addresses anthropologically relevant issues.
  • The note engages with anthropological method and theory.
  • NFJA Notes submission topics are fairly broad and may include but are not limited to:interesting historical notes, trends or practices in the field, definitions and/or discussion of term usage in the field, intriguing finds, case studies, preliminary findings, et cetera.

Editorials

  • Editorials are written, generally, by the editorial board as a whole or a subset of the board. The theme or topic to be discussed will be determined by the board. Although not all board members may choose to participate in writing the editorial, they participate in the decision-making process of whether or not to include the editorial in the publication.
  • For editorials that are written by outside authors (not members of the editorial board), these submissions will be managed by the Coordinating Editor in conjunction with the relevant Area Editor to determine their suitability for publication.
  • The following guidelines will be used to assess suitability for publication on all editorial submissions:
    • The editorial addresses anthropologically relevant issues.
    • The editorial fits with the appropriate theme of the issue.
    • The author addresses the possible larger implications of the editorial work.

Cover Art Imagery Restrictions: 

NFJA does not accept images containing human remains. In cases of images where living individuals’ faces can be seen in the photograph, permission must be obtained from the subject in order to be published unless the likeness is blurred or out of focus. For images of burials and associated burial objects (whether associated, under claim, or not), the NFJA NAGPRA policy applies. 

NFJA NAGPRA and Burial Imagery Policy

The New Florida Journal of Anthropology (NFJA) honors the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA), which encompasses Native American human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony. Publication of imagery of burial objects may present a conflict to descendant communities, including those cases where tribes are not recognized by NAGPRA, thus our policy applies to both NAGPRA claimants and non-NAGPRA recognized burial items. 

NAGPRA-eligible, and those not covered under NAGPRA, images of human remains or cultural objects, whether from claimed sites or sites not under claim, may not be created, published, or reproduced without written approval from the appropriate Native American tribes. It is the sole responsibility of the individual (author) publishing images to determine whether any additional permission, such as copyright clearance, is necessary and, if so, for obtaining the required permission and related written documentation. The individual (author) must submit these permissions along with their submission if such imagery falls under the above guidelines. NFJA is not responsible for any costs, claims, liabilities, or damages incurred as a result of any violation of copyright, trademark, privacy, or publicity rights, or other claims arising from use of its images. For the purposes of this policy, “images” is defined to include photographs, scans, 3D printing, CT and PET scans, MRIs, and any other depictions of NAGPRA-eligible human remains and cultural objects. NFJA retains the right to amend this policy without notice and to decline image submissions that violate this policy.

Editorials & Commentaries

Submission to NFJA implies that the content has not been published in elsewhere, except in cases of scientific meetings or symposiums. Please feel free to reach out to nfja@anthro.ufl.edu with any questions regarding submissions.

SUBJECT MATTER

NFJA accepts submissions relating to all sub-fields of Anthropology and tangentially related fields. These include, but are not limited to, History, Biology, Sociology, Geology, Linguistics, Women and Gender Studies, as well as regional disciplines (i.e. African Studies). Research that does not directly fall under the discipline of Anthropology must related to humans in some way. NFJA accepts submissions in the form of Articles, Book Reviews, Conference Reviews and Summaries, NFJA Notes, Perspectives in Anthropology, Dissertation and Thesis Abstracts, Photographic Essays, and Ethnographic Films.

FORMATTING

All written submissions should be 12pt font, Helvetica, single-spaced, with 1-inch margins. American English spelling is preferred. APA 7 citation style is required for both in-text citations and bibliographies. Information about APA 7 can be found here and here. We encourage the use of bias-free language in all submissions. Bibliographic references with DOI’s should be correctly hyperlinked to their DOI source page. In-text citations should be hyperlinked to their corresponding bibliographic entry.

EDITORIALS & COMMENTARIES 

Editorials and commentaries are written, generally, by the editorial board, but NFJA also accepts pieces by non-board members. Non-board members should reach out to the field related area editor directly to discuss their proposed submission. The theme or topic to be discussed will be determined by the board. This includes articles, news, reviews, interviews, advances in the field, etc. related to the journal's mission. However, authors are encouraged to contact the editorial board if they have an interest in submitting such content.  These are non-peer-reviewed submissions. For pieces written by outside authors (not members of the editorial board), these submissions will be managed by the relevant Area Editor to determine their suitability for publication. 

REVIEW CRITERIA

  • Editorials are written, generally, by the editorial board as a whole or a subset of the board. The theme or topic to be discussed will be determined by the board. Although not all board members may choose to participate in writing the editorial, they participate in the decision-making process of whether or not to include the editorial in the publication.
  • For editorials that are written by outside authors (not members of the editorial board), these submissions will be managed by the Coordinating Editor in conjunction with the relevant Area Editor to determine their suitability for publication.
  • The following guidelines will be used to assess suitability for publication on all editorial submissions:
    • The editorial addresses anthropologically relevant issues.
    • The editorial fits with the appropriate theme of the issue.
    • The author addresses the possible larger implications of the editorial work.

Articles (English and Non-English)

Submission to NFJA implies that the content has not been published in elsewhere, except in cases of scientific meetings or symposiums. Please feel free to reach out to nfja@anthro.ufl.edu with any questions regarding submissions.

SUBJECT MATTER

NFJA accepts submissions relating to all sub-fields of Anthropology and tangentially related fields. These include, but are not limited to, History, Biology, Sociology, Geology, Linguistics, Women and Gender Studies, as well as regional disciplines (i.e. African Studies). Research that does not directly fall under the discipline of Anthropology must related to humans in some way. NFJA accepts submissions in the form of Articles, Book Reviews, Conference Reviews and Summaries, NFJA Notes, Perspectives in Anthropology, Dissertation and Thesis Abstracts, and Ethnographic films.

PEER REVIEW 

Research Articles and Ethnographic films submissions undergo the peer review process. Ethnographic films undergo single-blind peer-review. Research Articles will be subjected to double-blind peer review. Book and Conference Reviews, Dissertation Abstracts, NFJA Notes, and Perspectives in Anthropology are not peer-reviewed and all decisions about their inclusion in the journal are made by the editorial board. When necessary, outside council may be sought by experts in the field to assess suitability for publication.

On the submission page, please include the following in the Peer-Reviewers Components document. Please note that the journal’s editors are not obliged to invite any recommended or opposed reviewers to assess your manuscript.

  • Suggested peer-reviewers for your submission (3-4)
  • List any individuals who you prefer not to review the submission
  • List any individuals who would present a conflict of interest

Recommended reviewers should be an expert in their field and must be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. Please be aware of any potential conflicts of interest when recommending reviewers. Examples of conflicts include, but are not limited to, the following guidelines:

  • The reviewer(s) should not have prior knowledge of your submission.
  • The reviewer(s) should not have collaborated (research, grants, publications, or projects) with any of the authors in the last 5 years.
  • The reviewer(s) should not be from the same institution as any of the authors.
  • The reviewer(s) should not have a personal relationship with any of the authors.

FORMATTING

All written submissions should be 12pt font, Helvetica, single-spaced, with 1-inch margins. American English spelling is preferred. APA 7 citation style is required for both in-text citations and bibliographies. Information about APA 7 can be found here and here. We encourage the use of bias-free language in all submissions. Bibliographic references with DOI’s should be correctly hyperlinked to their DOI source page. In-text citations should be hyperlinked to their corresponding bibliographic entry.

PROMOTION

If your submission is accepted, NFJA may decide to Tweet or blog about it or otherwise promote your work. Please include a Tweetable Summary of no more than 95 characters that conveys the essential message of your submission, as well as a photograph (if you choose) that relates to your research which we will post through the NFJA Twitter to promote your article. 

ARTICLE GUIDELINES

Articles are managed by the Area Editor that most closely aligns with the subject’s subfield. Articles are subjected to double-blind peer review. Articles should be between 3,000-8,000 words, but exceptions can be made when necessary. The organization of the article should generally include an Abstract, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Bibliography when applicable. Figures and tables are encouraged if they contribute to aiding the readers understanding of the material. When necessary, supplemental information can be submitted with the article. 

The submission should be submitted as separate files (Text, Figures and Tables, Tweetable Summary, and Supporting Information). Each figures should not be submitted as a separate file. All figures should be submitted as a single file that is separate from the text. Figure and table files should be accompanied by their respective captioning. Organization in this manner allows the editor to easily format the document for publication. To ensure ADA compliance, authors should include the alt-text with the image. More information about alt-text can be found on the American Anthropological Association website. 

The Text file should include: 

  • Title 
  • Full name(s) of the author(s) 
  • Institutional affiliations 
  • Abstract 
  • Key words (no more than 5)
  • Main text body 
  • Acknowledgements 
  • References 
  • Figure legends 

Figures should be submitted as editable files, not images. Reviewer recommendations/conflicts should be included as a separate text file. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

NON-ENGLISH SUBMISSIONS

NFJA accepts submissions in languages other than English on a case-by-case basis. Submissions are subject to the same “Article Guidelines” and must be accompanied by an American English translation of the title and abstract. These submissions are subject to the same peer-review process as all other submissions, although the reviewer must be a fluent in academic writing style of the respective language. These are managed by the relevant Area Editor in conjunction with the DEIA Editor. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

UNDERGRADUATE SUBMISSIONS GUIDELINES 

Undergraduate submissions are subject to the same "Article Guidelines" and double-blind peer-review processes specified above. Undergraduates are not permitted to submit articles as a single author. They must have a co-author that holds a minimum of a master's degree.  Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

REVIEW CRITERIA

All submissions will be assessed for appropriateness to determine their acceptance in NFJA using the following criteria.

  • The submission engages with anthropological method and theory as it relates to the appropriate subfield.
  • The submission presents original research that addresses a question(s) of anthropological interest with new data and/or analyses produced by the author(s).
  • The submission is free of spelling, grammar, punctuation errors.
  • The submission follows all formatting guidelines, including citations.
  • The submission has all relevant components (Introduction, Methods, Results, etc.).
  • The submission is the appropriate length based on the submission type.
  • The main question addressed by the research is relevant and interesting.
  • The topic of the research is original, interesting, and adds to the subject area compared with other published material.
  • The submission is well written and the text is clear and easy to read.
  • The conclusions are consistent with the evidence and arguments presented. They address the main question posed by the author(s).
  • If the author(s) is disagreeing significantly with the current academic consensus, they must make a substantial and credible case.
  • Tables or figures included in the submission aid understanding the author(s) main points.
  • There are no major flaws in the submission (i.e. Drawing a conclusion that is contradicted by the author's own statistical or qualitative evidence. The use of a discredited method. Ignoring a process that is known to have a strong influence on the area under study. Insufficient data. Statistically non-significant variations. Unclear data tables. Contradictory data that either are not self-consistent or disagree with the conclusions. Confirmatory data that adds little, if anything, to current understanding - unless strong arguments for such repetition are made).
  • The title, abstract, and key words are optimized for search purposes (SEO).

Book Reviews

Submission to NFJA implies that the content has not been published in elsewhere, except in cases of scientific meetings or symposiums. Please feel free to reach out to nfja@anthro.ufl.edu with any questions regarding submissions.

SUBJECT MATTER

NFJA accepts submissions relating to all sub-fields of Anthropology and tangentially related fields. These include, but are not limited to, History, Biology, Sociology, Geology, Linguistics, Women and Gender Studies, as well as regional disciplines (i.e. African Studies). Research that does not directly fall under the discipline of Anthropology must related to humans in some way. NFJA accepts submissions in the form of Articles, Book Reviews, Conference Reviews and Summaries, NFJA Notes, Perspectives in Anthropology, Dissertation and Thesis Abstracts, and Ethnographic films.

BOOK REVIEW GUIDELINES 

NFJA accepts submissions for book reviews as non-peer review content. They should be between 600-2,000 words, but ideally around 750 words. They should include a statement about the significance of the book, and its central themes, but should not simply summarize the book. Consider the impact the piece of work might have on the respective field of research. Does the author(s) have sound methodology? Are there gaps in the knowledge or problematic writing styles? Does this work have the ability to serve not only academic realms but reach out to boarder audiences? These are just suggestions for things to consider, but feel free to expand on any avenue which you feel fits best with your review.

Book reviews are managed by the Review Editor. These are not peer-reviewed submissions, thus their inclusion in the journal is determined by the editorial board. When necessary, outside council may be sought by experts in the field to assess suitability for publication. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

FORMATTING

All written submissions should be 12pt font, Helvetica, single-spaced, with 1-inch margins. American English spelling is preferred. APA 7 citation style is required for both in-text citations and bibliographies. Information about APA 7 can be found here and here. We encourage the use of bias-free language in all submissions. Bibliographic references with DOI’s should be correctly hyperlinked to their DOI source page. In-text citations should be hyperlinked to their corresponding bibliographic entry.

REVIEW CRITERIA

  • The book fits within the NFJA research scope and asks anthropologically relevant questions.
  • The book engages with anthropological method and theory.
  • The review includes a statement about the significance of the book.
  • The review include a statement about the book’s central themes.
  • The review does not simply summarize the book.
  • The review considers the impact the piece of work might have on the respective field of research.
  • If applicable, does the review discuss possible gaps in the knowledge or problematic writing styles.
  • The review addresses if the book has the ability to serve not only academic realms but reach out to boarder audiences.

 

 

Conference Review

Submission to NFJA implies that the content has not been published in elsewhere, except in cases of scientific meetings or symposiums. Please feel free to reach out to nfja@anthro.ufl.edu with any questions regarding submissions.

SUBJECT MATTER

NFJA accepts submissions relating to all sub-fields of Anthropology and tangentially related fields. These include, but are not limited to, History, Biology, Sociology, Geology, Linguistics, Women and Gender Studies, as well as regional disciplines (i.e., African Studies). Research that does not directly fall under the discipline of Anthropology must related to humans in some way. NFJA accepts submissions in the form of Articles, Book Reviews, Conference Reviews and Summaries, NFJA Notes, Perspectives in Anthropology, Dissertation and Thesis Abstracts, and Ethnographic films.

FORMATTING

All written submissions should be 12pt font, Helvetica, single-spaced, with 1-inch margins. American English spelling is preferred. APA 7 citation style is required for both in-text citations and bibliographies. Information about APA 7 can be found here and here. We encourage the use of bias-free language in all submissions. Bibliographic references with DOI’s should be correctly hyperlinked to their DOI source page. In-text citations should be hyperlinked to their corresponding bibliographic entry.

CONFERENCE REVIEW GUIDELINES 

Conference Reviews will vary depending on the submission type. Authors may either review a single presentation, an entire session, or an entire conference summary. All should be between 600-2,000 words, although exceptions can be made.

These submissions are not peer-reviewed and final decisions on inclusion in the journal will be made by the editorial board. When necessary, outside council may be sought by experts in the field to assess suitability for publication. Conference submissions are managed by the Review Editor. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

Single presentations or session reviews should include a concise summary of the discussion clearly stating the aims and findings of the research, as well as an overview of the methodology employed. It should also include a review of the broader impact the research might have. Finally, it should include the authors own opinion on the research presented.  Possible things to consider: Was the presenter/session organized and knowledgeable on the subject? Was the material presented in concise, meaningful manner? Did the research employ novel methodology? How will the research impact the field at large? Was this research appropriate for the conference in which it was presented?

Conference summaries should clearly state the name, date(s), location, keynote speakers, and focus of the conference. It should cover the main highlights of the conference and any interesting or novel developments in the field which arose. Be sure to summarize the overall thematic events which occurred and any impressions you (and other conference attendees) may have felt. Consider: Was the conference successful?  Where might there be room for improvement in the future? Where there any specific trends in overall research trajectories?

REVIEW CRITERIA

  • The single presentations or session review includes a concise summary of the discussion.
  • It clearly states the aims and findings of the research presented, as well as an overview of the methodology employed.
  • It includes a review of the broader impact the research might have.
  • It addresses if the presenter/session was organized and knowledgeable on the subject.
  • It discusses if the research is appropriate for the conference in which it was presented.

Dissertation and Thesis Abstracts

THESIS/DISSERTATION ABSTRACTS 

Abstracts must be from an officially accepted dissertation. They must match that exactly which was put forth by the university. These submissions are not peer-reviewed and final decisions on its inclusion in the journal will be made by the editorial board. When necessary, outside council may be sought by experts in the field to assess suitability for publication. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed. Thesis and dissertation abstracts are managed by the Review Editor.

Submissions must be accompanied by a statement that include 1) the name of the department and university where the thesis/dissertation was submitted, 2) the full and correct name of the author at the time they submitted their thesis/dissertation to the university, 3) the date in which they submitted their thesis/dissertation to the university.

FORMATTING

All written submissions should be 12pt font, Helvetica, single-spaced, with 1-inch margins. American English spelling is preferred. APA 7 citation style is required for both in-text citations and bibliographies. Information about APA 7 can be found here and here. We encourage the use of bias-free language in all submissions. Bibliographic references with DOI’s should be correctly hyperlinked to their DOI source page. In-text citations should be hyperlinked to their corresponding bibliographic entry.

REVIEW CRITERIA

  • The abstract is well written.
  • The abstract provides a good summary of the authors research.
  • The abstract considers the broader impacts of the thesis/dissertation.
  • The dissertation has been officially accepted by the author’s graduate school

Ethnographic Film

Submission to NFJA implies that the content has not been published in elsewhere, except in cases of scientific meetings or symposiums. Please feel free to reach out to nfja@anthro.ufl.edu with any questions regarding submissions.

SUBJECT MATTER

NFJA accepts submissions relating to all sub-fields of Anthropology and tangentially related fields. These include, but are not limited to, History, Biology, Sociology, Geology, Linguistics, Women and Gender Studies, as well as regional disciplines (i.e., African Studies). Research that does not directly fall under the discipline of Anthropology must related to humans in some way. NFJA accepts submissions in the form of Articles, Book Reviews, Conference Reviews and Summaries, NFJA Notes, Perspectives in Anthropology, Dissertation and Thesis Abstracts, and Ethnographic films.

PEER REVIEW 

Research Articles and Ethnographic films submissions undergo the peer review process. Ethnographic films undergo single-blind peer-review. Research Articles will be subjected to double-blind peer review. Book and Conference Reviews, Dissertation Abstracts, NFJA Notes, and Perspectives in Anthropology are not peer-reviewed and all decisions about their inclusion in the journal are made by the editorial board. When necessary, outside council may be sought by experts in the field to assess suitability for publication.

On the submission page, please include the following in the Peer-Reviewers Components document. Please note that the journal’s editors are not obliged to invite any recommended or opposed reviewers to assess your manuscript.

  • Suggested peer-reviewers for your submission (3-4)
  • List any individuals who you prefer not to review the submission
  • List any individuals who would present a conflict of interest

Recommended reviewers should be an expert in their field and must be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. Please be aware of any potential conflicts of interest when recommending reviewers. Examples of conflicts include, but are not limited to, the following guidelines:

  • The reviewer(s) should not have prior knowledge of your submission.
  • The reviewer(s) should not have collaborated (research, grants, publications, or projects) with any of the authors in the last 5 years.
  • The reviewer(s) should not be from the same institution as any of the authors.
  • The reviewer(s) should not have a personal relationship with any of the authors.

 

PROMOTION

If your submission is accepted, NFJA may decide to Tweet or blog about it or otherwise promote your work. Please include a Tweetable Summary of no more than 95 characters that conveys the essential message of your submission, as well as a photograph (if you choose) that relates to your research which we will post through the NFJA Twitter to promote your article. 

VIDEO SUBMISSION GUIDELINES

Ethnographic films and videos are defined broadly as works created as the result of ethnographic fieldwork or those which use, are informed by, or illustrate the principles of anthropological theory or methods. Submissions are subject to the peer-review process, considering both their technical merits and their contribution to scholarship.

These submissions are single-blind, where the author does not know the identity of the reviewer, but the reviewers are able to identify the author. These submissions are managed by the Visual Media Editor. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

Submissions should be made electronically through the FOJ website, providing information about the film and the research it is based on. Please include a short abstract of the work as well as a biographical note in the 'bio statement' section of the profile form, listing the role(s) of producer, director, photographer, editor, production assistant, academic advisor, writers, and any other persons of note in the production.

Films should be less than 40 minutes in length, but exceptions may be made for films of exceptional quality. The submission must include a link to the film. You may use a trusted file share service or a video-sharing website, such as Vimeo, Dropbox, or YouTube (hosting platform). Please make sure the film is viewable by anyone with link. If the film is password protected please provide the password in your comments.

REVIEW CRITERIA

  • The film engages with ethnographic method and theory.
  • It is the result of fieldwork or is it informed by or illustrates the principles of anthropological theory or methods.
  • Is technically well produced.
  • Contributes to anthropological scholarship at large.
  • If there broader impacts, they are discussed.
  • Includes all relevant components (abstract of the work as well as a biographical note, a list of the role(s) of producer, director, photographer, editor, production assistant, academic advisor, writers, and any other persons of note in the production).
  • The main question addressed by the research is relevant and interesting.
  • If there is text in the film (captions etc.), it should be well written, free of grammatical and spelling errors, clear and easy to read from a visual standpoint. The text should aid the viewer in understanding the research topic.
  • The conclusions are consistent with the evidence and arguments presented.
  • The title and abstract of the film are engaging enough to draw in the intended viewers.
  • The film provides enough cultural and/or historical context for this particular audience to understand the film and its significance both to its original audience and to us in the here and now.
  • The film should have benefit to both the anthropological community at large as well as to the subjects of the film. Consider if there could be potential danger to the subject population by publishing this film.
  • The film’s organization is optimal for presenting the author’s main point. The transitions between frames/subject are adequate but not mechanical or repetitive.
  • The thesis is clear and reasonable, considering the evidence provided. There is enough support to adequately persuade the public of the authors claims about the subject/problem posed.

Perspectives in Anthropology

Submission to NFJA implies that the content has not been published in elsewhere, except in cases of scientific meetings or symposiums. Please feel free to reach out to nfja@anthro.ufl.edu with any questions regarding submissions.

SUBJECT MATTER

NFJA accepts submissions relating to all sub-fields of Anthropology and tangentially related fields. These include, but are not limited to, History, Biology, Sociology, Geology, Linguistics, Women and Gender Studies, as well as regional disciplines (i.e., African Studies). Research that does not directly fall under the discipline of Anthropology must related to humans in some way. NFJA accepts submissions in the form of Articles, Book Reviews, Conference Reviews and Summaries, NFJA Notes, Perspectives in Anthropology, Dissertation and Thesis Abstracts, and Ethnographic films.

FORMATTING

These submissions should be between 500-1,500 words. All written submissions should be 12pt font, Helvetica, single-spaced, with 1-inch margins. American English spelling is preferred. APA 7 citation style is required for both in-text citations and bibliographies. Information about APA 7 can be found here and here. We encourage the use of bias-free language in all submissions. We encourage the use of bias-free language in all submissions. Bibliographic references with DOI’s should be correctly hyperlinked to their DOI source page. In-text citations should be hyperlinked to their corresponding bibliographic entry.

PROMOTION

If your submission is accepted, NFJA may decide to Tweet or blog about it or otherwise promote your work. Please include a Tweetable Summary of no more than 95 characters that conveys the essential message of your submission, as well as a photograph (if you choose) that relates to your research which we will post through the NFJA Twitter to promote your article. 

PERSPECTIVES IN ANTHROPOLOGY 

Perspectives in Anthropology features short-form essays on social or practical issues that directly face underrepresented scholars within the field, or timely issues in anthropology. Original research is not required for submissions as the intention is to provide a platform for those who wish to communicate their experiences and perspectives in relation to the field of anthropology. Topics can range from the identification of  issues to pathways forward to encourage positive actions for meaningful change. BIPOC and LGBTQI+ individuals are encouraged to submit.

Non-English submissions are welcome, both English and non-English versions will be published. Submissions should be roughly between 500 and 1500 words. Please include a brief summary (< 100 words) of the essay that can be used for promotional purposes (i.e. social media, newsletter).

These submissions are managed by the Perspectives Editor. These submissions are not peer-reviewed and final decisions on its inclusion in the journal will be made by the editorial board. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

REVIEW CRITERIA

  • The work focuses on social or practical issues that directly face underrepresented scholars within the field.
  • The work focuses on both issues and pathways forward to encourage positive actions for meaningful change.
  • The author is the appropriate person to write about such subjects.
  • There are no larger underlying issues with the manuscript that need to be addressed.

NFJA Notes

Submission to NFJA implies that the content has not been published in elsewhere, except in cases of scientific meetings or symposiums. Please feel free to reach out to nfja@anthro.ufl.edu with any questions regarding submissions.

SUBJECT MATTER

NFJA accepts submissions relating to all sub-fields of Anthropology and tangentially related fields. These include, but are not limited to, History, Biology, Sociology, Geology, Linguistics, Women and Gender Studies, as well as regional disciplines (i.e., African Studies). Research that does not directly fall under the discipline of Anthropology must related to humans in some way. NFJA accepts submissions in the form of Articles, Book Reviews, Conference Reviews and Summaries, NFJA Notes, Perspectives in Anthropology, Dissertation and Thesis Abstracts, and Ethnographic films.

FORMATTING

All written submissions should be 12pt font, Helvetica, single-spaced, with 1-inch margins. American English spelling is preferred. APA 7 citation style is required for both in-text citations and bibliographies. Information about APA 7 can be found here and here.We encourage the use of bias-free language in all submissions. Bibliographic references with DOI’s should be correctly hyperlinked to their DOI source page. In-text citations should be hyperlinked to their corresponding bibliographic entry.

PROMOTION

If your submission is accepted, NFJA may decide to Tweet or blog about it or otherwise promote your work. Please include a Tweetable Summary of no more than 95 characters that conveys the essential message of your submission, as well as a photograph (if you choose) that relates to your research which we will post through the NFJA Twitter to promote your article. 

NFJA NOTES

NFJA Notes submissions should feature brief discussions of anthropological topics. This submission topic is fairly broad and may include but is not limited to: interesting historical notes, trends or practices in the field, definitions and/or discussion of term usage in the field, intriguing finds, case studies, preliminary findings, et cetera. Submissions must remain under 450 words (titles and references do NOT count toward the total word count) and utilize a maximum of three (3) references. One (1) figure or table may also be used to supplement your short submission but is not required. 

 Your submission should include separate files for a title page, main text body, bibliography, and figure/table (if applicable). The title page should explicitly list the submission title, the full name(s) of the author(s), institutional affiliation(s), acknowledgements, key words (no more than 5), and the total word count. The figure/table should be submitted as an editable file (not an image). To ensure ADA compliance, authors should include the alt-text with the image. More information about alt-text can be found at on the American Anthropological Association website.

NFJA Notes are managed by the relevant Area Editor. These submissions are not peer-reviewed and final decisions on its inclusion in the journal will be made by the editorial board. Please see review criteria below for details on how your submission will be assessed.

REVIEW CRITERIA

  • The note addresses anthropologically relevant issues.
  • The note engages with anthropological method and theory.
  • NFJA Notes submission topics are fairly broad and may include but are not limited to:interesting historical notes, trends or practices in the field, definitions and/or discussion of term usage in the field, intriguing finds, case studies, preliminary findings, et cetera.

Photographic Essay

Photographic essays are accepted as peer-reviewed submissions. Photographic essays present a series of images gathered through field research and should reflect the ethnographer’s field site, perspectives in the field, and include descriptions about what is captured within the frame.

Submissions may include 5-20 images, captions of up to 350 words per caption, and up to 2,000 words of introductory text. Text should be 12pt font, Helvetica, single-spaced, with 1-inch margins. American English spelling is preferred. APA 7 citation style is required for both in-text citations and bibliographies. Information about APA 7 can be found here and here. We encourage the use of bias-free language in all submissions. All images are required to have robust and accessible alt-text. Information about accessibility compliance can be found here and here.

Copyright Notice

By submitting to the New Florida Journal of Anthropology, the author(s) agree to the terms of the Author Agreement. All authors retain copyrights associated with their article contributions and agree to make such contributions available under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license upon publication.

Florida OJ Author Agreement (University of Florida)

The following agreement takes effect upon acceptance of the Submission (“Submission”) for publication in the New Florida Journal of Anthropology:

I hereby grant to the University of Florida (“the University”) the non-exclusive right to retain, reproduce and distribute the Submission in whole or in part, in print and electronic format and in any medium. This agreement does not represent a transfer of copyright to the University.

The University may make and keep multiple copies of the work for purposes of security, backup, preservation and access; and may migrate the work to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation and access.

I represent and warrant to the University that the work is my original work and that I have the authority as sole author or I have the authority on behalf of my co-authors to grant the rights contained in this agreement. I also represent that the work does not, to the best of my knowledge, infringe or violate any rights of others.

I further represent and warrant that I have obtained all necessary rights to permit the University to reproduce and distribute the work, including any third-party material. Alternatively, I represent that my use of any third-party material is allowed because the material is not in copyright or I have performed a fair use analysis and reasonably believe my use is permitted. Any content owned by a third party is clearly identified and acknowledged within the work.

I grant these same rights to New Florida Journal of Anthropology. Additionally, I grant the right to both the University and New Florida Journal of Anthropology to enter into agreements with third-party entities and the rights necessary to host, print, index and abstract the Submission.

Open Access and Self-Archiving

The New Florida Journal of Anthropology follows an open-access publishing model, meaning that all articles will be publicly accessible on the Internet immediately upon publication.Authors may share the submitted manuscript (preprint) of the Submission on the Internet at any point before or after publication, with a citation and link to the final version of record to be added as soon as the issue is available. The author may disseminate the final peer-reviewed version at any point after publication.

Creative Commons License

The New Florida Journal of Anthropology applies a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license to encourage sharing and reuse of content and to maximize the impact of published research. By publishing in the New Florida Journal of Anthropology, authors agree that the terms of this license will be applied to the Submission. The George A. Smathers Libraries at the University of Florida (copyright@uflib.ufl.edu) may be able to offer additional information.

By granting this license, authors acknowledge that they have read and agreed to the terms of this agreement.

Privacy Statement

The Florida OJ service is provided through the Florida Virtual Campus (FLVC) and the George A. Smathers Libraries at the University of Florida. | FLVC Privacy Policy.