When Organizational Advocacy and Public Advocacy Intersect in CSR: Examining Stage of Partnership and Activism in CSR Partnerships
CSR partnerships have evolved and taken various forms as companies and nonprofit organizations work toward creating societal change for the public good. This study examined public relations advocacy in the context of CSR communication through a 2 x 2 online experiment with a sample of 240 participants. Specifically, this study examined interactions between CSR fit, stage of partnership, and individuals’ activism levels on individuals’ attitude toward a company, a nonprofit, and skepticism levels toward the CSR partnership. High fit and philanthropic stage of partnership became significant factors on attitude toward the company. Individuals’ activism levels had a positive interaction with stage of partnership in predicting skepticism toward the partnership. Theoretical implications and practical applications for public interest communications are discussed.
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2017). On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0149206317691575
Aksak, E. O., Ferguson, M. A., & Duman, S. A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and CSR fit as predictors of corporate reputation: A global perspective. Public Relations Review, 42, 79-81. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.004
Al-Dmour, H., Al-Madani, S., Alansari, I., Tarhini, A., & Al-Dmour, R. H. (2016). Factors affecting the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaign: Moderating effect of sponsor-cause congruence. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 8(5), 114. doi:10.5539/ijms.v8n5p114
Arenas, D., Sanchez, P., & Murphy, M. (2013). Different paths to collaboration between businesses and civil society and the role of third parties. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 723-739. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1829-5
The Aspen Institute. (2002). The nonprofit sector and business: New visions, new opportunities, new challenges. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute Nonprofit Sector Strategy Group.
The Aspen Institute (2013). A focus on corporate philanthropy: How Intel integrates social impact into its philanthropic programs and core business strategies. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute Nonprofit Sector Strategy Group.
Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69-97. doi:10.1177/0899764000291s004
Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012a). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), 726-758. doi:10.1177/0899764012450777
Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012b). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses. Part 2: Partnership processes and outcomes. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 929-968. doi:10.1177/0899764012454685
Bachmann, P., & Ingenhoff, D. (2016). Legitimacy through CSR disclosures? The advantage outweighs the disadvantages. Public Relations Review, 42, 386-394. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.02.008
Baur, D., & Schmitz, H. P. (2012). Corporations and NGOs: When accountability leads to co-optation. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 9-21. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1057-9
Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46-53. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001
Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2004). Social alliances: Company/nonprofit collaboration. California Management Review, 47(1), 58-90.
Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Kozinets, R. V. (1999). Consumer persuasion through cause-related advertising. Advances in Consumer Research, 26(1), 491–497.
Bies, R. J., Bartunek, J. M., Fort, T. L., & Zald, M. N. (2007). Corporations as social change agents: Individual, interpersonal, institutional, and environmental dynamics. Academy of Management Review, 32, 788–793. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275515
Bigné-Alcañiz, E., Currás-Pérez, R., Ruiz-Mafé, C., & Sanz-Blas, S. (2010). Consumer behavioural intentions in cause-related marketing. The role of identification and social cause involvement. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 7(2), 127-143. doi:10.1007/s12208-010-0053-6
Bigné-Alcañiz, E., Currás-Pérez, R., & Sánchez-García, I. (2009). Brand credibility in cause-related marketing: The moderating role of consumer values. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18(6), 437-447. doi:10.1108/10610420910989758
Borojevic, T., Petrovic, N. B., & Vuk, D. (2014). Youth and environmental education for sustainable development. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(9), 57-62.
Cameron, K. A., Campo, S., & Brossard, D. (2003). Advocating for controversial issues: The effect of activism on compliance‐gaining strategy likelihood of use. Communication Studies, 54(3), 265-281. doi:10.1080/10510970309363286
Chandler, D., & Werther Jr., W. (2014). Strategic corporate responsibility: Stakeholders, globalization, and sustainable value creation. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Chen, R., Su, S., & He, F. (2014). Does cause congruence affect how different corporate associations influence consumer responses to cause-related marketing? Australian Journal of Management, 39(2), 191-206. doi:10.1177/0312896213502992
Clark, C. E. (2000). Differences between public relations and corporate social responsibility: An analysis. Public Relations Review, 26, 363-380. doi:10.1016/s0363-8111(00)00053-9
The Coca-Cola Company. (2017, August 15). 2016 Sustainability report: Water stewardship. The Coca Cola Company. Retrieved from http://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/2016-water-stewardship
Coombs, W., & Holladay, S. J. (2013). The pseudo-panopticon: The illusion created by CSR-related transparency and the internet. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 212-227. doi:10.1108/13563281311319490
Confino. J. (2014, April 30). Best practices in sustainability: Ford, Starbucks and more. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/best-practices-sustainability-us-corporations-ceres
de Bakker, F., & Den Hond, F. (2008). Activists' influence tactics and corporate policies. Business Communication Quarterly, 71(1), 107-111. doi:10.1177/1080569907313381
de Jong, M. D., & van der Meer, M. (2017). How does it fit? Exploring the congruence between organizations and their corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 71-83. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2782-2
Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional‐Stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47-73. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00582.x
Doh, J. P., & Teegen, H. (2003). Globalization and NGOs: Transforming business, government, and society. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 224-241. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.01.001
Grunig, J. E. (1997). A situational theory of publics: Conceptual history, recent challenges and new research. In D. Moss, T. MacManus, & D. Vercic (Eds.), Public relations research: An international perspective (pp. 3–46). London: International Thomson Business.
Grunig, J. E. (2000). Collectivism, collaboration, and societal corporatism as core professional values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 23-48. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1201_3
Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (1997, July). Review of a program of research on activism: Incidence in four countries, activist publics, strategies of activist groups, and organizational responses to activism. Paper presented to the Fourth Public Relations Research Symposium, Managing Environmental Issues, Lake Bled, Slovenia.
Hallahan, K. (2000). Inactive publics: The forgotten publics in public relations. Public Relations Review, 26, 499-515. doi:10.1016/s0363-8111(00)00061-8
Herlin, H. (2015). Better safe than sorry: Nonprofit organizational legitimacy and cross-sector partnerships. Business & Society, 54(6), 822-858. doi:10.1177/0007650312472609
Howie, K. M., Yang, L., Vitell, S. J., Bush, V., & Vorhies, D. (2018). Consumer participation in cause-related marketing: An examination of effort demands and defensive denial. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(3), 679-692. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2961-1
Hyllegard, K. H., Yan, R. N., Ogle, J. P., & Attmann, J. (2010). The influence of gender, social cause, charitable support, and message appeal on Gen Y's responses to cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(1-2), 100-123. doi:10.1080/02672571003683755
Jamali, D., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Uneasy alliances: Lessons learned from partnerships between businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 277-295. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9708-1
Kang, J., & Hustvedt, G. (2014). Building trust between consumers and corporations: The role of consumer perceptions of transparency and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 253-265. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1916-7
Kim, H. K., & Yang, S. U. (2009). Cognitive processing of crisis communication: Effects of CSR and crisis response strategies on stakeholder perceptions of a racial crisis dynamics. Public Relations Journal, 3(1), 1-39.
Kim, J.-N., & Grunig, J. E. (2011). Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication, 61, 120-149. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01529.x
Kim, J.-N. & Ni, L. (2010). Seeing the forest through the trees: The behavioral, strategic management paradigm in public relations and its future. In R. H. Heath (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of public relations (pp. 35–57). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Kim, N., Sung, Y., & Lee, M. (2012). Consumer evaluations of social alliances: The effects of perceived fit between companies and non-profit organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 163-174. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1115-3
Kim, Y. (2014). Strategic communication of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Effects of stated motives and corporate reputation on stakeholder responses. Public Relations Review, 40, 838-840. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.005
Kim, Y. J., & Lee, W-N. (2009). Overcoming consumer skepticism in cause-related marketing: The effects of corporate social responsibility and donation size claim objectivity. Journal of Promotion Management, 15, 465-483. doi:10.1080/10496490903270232
Kim, Y. S., & Choi, Y. (2012). College students' perception of Philip Morris's tobacco-related smoking prevention and tobacco-unrelated social responsibility. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(2), 184-199. doi:10.1080/1062726x.2012.626138
Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 92-109. doi:10.1509/jmkg.22.214.171.124770
Kovacs, R. (2006). Interdisciplinary bar for the public interest: What CSR and NGO frameworks contribute to the public relations of British and European activists. Public Relations Review, 32, 429-431. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.09.013
Lee, S. Y., & Rim, H. (2016). Negative spillover in corporate–nonprofit partnerships: Exploring the effects of company–cause congruence and organization–public relationships. Public Relations Review, 42, 710-712. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.06.003
Liston-Heyes, C., & Liu, G. (2013). A study of non-profit organisations in cause-related marketing: Stakeholder concerns and safeguarding strategies. European Journal of Marketing, 47(11/12), 1954-1974. doi:10.1108/ejm-03-2012-0142
Menon, S., & Kahn, B. E. (2003). Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: When do they impact perception of sponsor brand? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 316-327. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1303_12
Nan, X., & Heo, K. (2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63-74. doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367360204
Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241-265. doi:10.2307/258156
Park, S. Y., Hitchon, J. B., & Yun, G. W. (2004). The effects of brand familiarity in alignment advertising. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(4), 750-765. doi:10.1177/107769900408100403
Pérez, A. (2015). Corporate reputation and CSR reporting to stakeholders: Gaps in the literature and future lines of research. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(1), 11-29. doi:10.1108/ccij-01-2014-0003
Rifon, N.J., Choi, S.M., Trimble, C.S. and Li, H. (2004), Congruence effects in sponsorship.
The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive, Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 29-42. doi:10.1080/00913367.2004.10639151
Rim, H., & Kim, S. (2016). Dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) skepticism and their impacts on public evaluations toward CSR. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(5-6), 248-267. doi:10.1080/1062726x.2016.1261702
Rim, H., & Song, D. (2013). The ability of corporate blog communication to enhance CSR effectiveness: The role of prior company reputation and blog responsiveness. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(3), 165-185. doi:10.1080/1553118x.2012.738743
Rim, H., Yang, S. U., & Lee, J. (2016). Strategic partnerships with nonprofits in corporate social responsibility (CSR): The mediating role of perceived altruism and organizational identification. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3213-3219. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.035
Roy, D. P., & Cornwell, T. B. (2004). The effects of consumer knowledge on responses to event sponsorships. Psychology & Marketing, 21(3), 185-207. doi:10.1002/mar.20001
Sheikh, S. U. R., & Beise-Zee, R. (2011). Corporate social responsibility or cause-related marketing? The role of cause specificity of CSR. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 27-39. doi:10.1108/07363761111101921
Shim, K., Chung, M., & Kim, Y. (2017). Does ethical orientation matter? Determinants of public reaction to CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 43, 817-828. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.05.001
Sriramesh, K. (2006). The relationship between culture and public relations. In E. Toth (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management: Challenges for the next generation (pp. 507–527). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tao, W., & Ferguson, M. A. (2015). The overarching effects of ethical reputation regardless of CSR cause fit and information source. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(1), 23-43. doi:10.1080/1553118x.2014.954285
Tarrow, S. G. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Torres-Harding, S. R., Siers, B., & Olson, B. D. (2012). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Social Justice Scale (SJS). American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(1-2), 77-88. doi:10.1007/s10464-011-9478-2
Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 434. doi:10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1994
Vock, M., Van Dolen, W., & Kolk, A. (2013). Changing behaviour through business-nonprofit collaboration? Consumer responses to social alliances. European Journal of Marketing, 47(9), 1476-1503. doi:10.1108/ejm-10-2011-0546
Ward, J. I. (2014, February 5). Coca-Cola’s new formula for water stewardship: Government partnership. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/coca-cola-usda-water-partnership-watersheds
Waters, R. D., & Ott, H. K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and the nonprofit sector: Assessing the thoughts and practices across three nonprofit subsectors. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 1–18.
Authors publishing their work in the Journal of Public Interest Communications retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. By agreeing to these terms, the author(s) grant and assign the following rights to the Publisher:
- The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter discovered, including electronic format.
- The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials, and
- The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website).