INFECTION AND REPRODUCTION OF MELOIDOGYNE ENTEROLOBII AND M. JAVANICA ON Mi-TOMATOES UNDER GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS IN FLORIDA

Authors

  • Marian Méndez Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma, Florida 33598
  • Hung Xuan Bui Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma, Florida 33598
  • Johan Desaeger Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma, Florida 33598

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63965/NGMU3616

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes (RKN, Meloidogyne spp.) are major yield-limiting pests in tomato production. Mi-tomato cultivars resist common RKN species, including Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica, and M. arenaria, making them valuable tools in integrated nematode management. However, increasing reports of guava RKN, M. enterolobii, in Florida and worldwide, including tomato fields, raise concern, as the Mi‑genes reportedly do not protect against this species. This study evaluated infection and reproduction of M. enterolobii and M. javanica from Florida on Mi-tomato cultivars (‘Sanibel’, ‘Southern Ripe’, ‘Skyway 687’, and ‘Mariana’) and one non-Mi cultivar (‘HM1823’) under greenhouse conditions in fall 2024 and spring 2025. Parameters assessed included gall numbers and nematode penetration at 14 days post inoculation (DPI) and gall rating, egg production, and reproduction factor and plant growth at 56 DPI. Except for ‘Sanibel’, all Mi-cultivars provided good protection against M. javanica with lower root gall damage and nematode reproduction. All Mi cultivars allowed high reproduction of M. enterolobii and were severely damaged by M. enterolobii, similar to the non-Mi cultivar. On the susceptible cultivar, M. enterolobii was also more damaging than M. javanica producing higher gall numbers, greater penetration rates, and more severe galling, higher egg numbers and reproduction factors, and smaller plants. These findings highlight the urgency of diversifying resistance sources and enhancing integrated management approaches to mitigate the threat of M. enterolobii in Florida tomato production.

References

Brito, J. A., Desaeger, J. A., & Dickson, D. W. (2020). Reproduction of Meloidogyne enterolobii on selected root-knot nematode‑resistant sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) cultivars. Journal of Nematology, 52, 1‑6. https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2020-063

Bridge, J., & Page, S. L. (1980). Estimation of root‑knot nematode infestation levels on roots using a rating chart. International Journal of Pest Management, 26, 296-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670878009414416

Bui, H. X., & Desaeger, J. A. (2022). Susceptibility and host potential of six cucurbit crops to Meloidogyne enterolobii, M. floridensis, M. hapla, M. incognita, and M. javanica. Nematology, 24(10), 1‑10. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-bja10195

Bui, H., Jacobs, D., Xie, C., Nguyen, H.Q., & Desaeger, J. (2025). Effect of soil storage duration and two nematode extraction methods on nematode recovery from a Florida sandy soil. Nematology, 27(8), 887–893. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-bja10427

Castagnone-Sereno, P., Danchin, E. G. J., Perfus‑Barbeoch, L., & Abad, P. (2013). Diversity and evolution of root-knot nematodes, genus Meloidogyne: New insights from the genomic era. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 51, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102300

California Department of Food and Agriculture. (2024). Initial statement of reasons for 3 CCR § 3289 Guava root-knot nematode exterior quarantine. https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/docs/3289_isor.pdf. Accessed on: February 09, 2026.

Collett, R. L., Rashidifard, M., Marais, M., Daneel, M. S., & Fourie, H. (2024). Insights into the life-cycle development of Meloidogyne enterolobii, M. incognita, and M. javanica on tomato, soybean, and maize. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 168, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-023-02741-9

Cunha, D. F., Pinto, T. J. B., de Noronha Fonseca, M. E., da Silva, G. O., Rafael, F. S., Santos, L. A., Cares, J. E., Pinheiro, J. B., & Boiteux, L. S. (2025). Assessing the residual effects of the tomato Mi-1.2 gene against a Meloidogyne enterolobii (guava race) population via comparative assays with contrasting near‑isogenic lines. Tropical Plant Pathology, 50(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-025-00743-y

El-Sappah, A. H., Islam, I. M., El-Awady, H., Yan, S., Qi, S., Liu, J., Cheng, G.-T., & Liang, Y. (2019). Tomato natural resistance genes in controlling the root-knot nematode. Genes, 10(11), 925. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10110925

Feng, T., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Pei, J., Peng, D., Peng, H., & Long, H. (2024). A novel chorismate mutase effector secreted from root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii manipulates plant immunity to promote parasitism. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 23(12), 4107–4119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2023.11.039

Forge, T. A., & Kimpinski, J. (2007). Nematodes. In M. R. Carter & E. G. Gregorich (Eds.), Soil sampling and methods of analysis (pp. 415‑425). CRC Press.

He, Z., Webster, S., & He, S. Y. (2022). Growth‑defense trade-offs in plants. Current Biology, 32(12), 634-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.070

Hooper, D. J., & Evans, K. (1993). Extraction, identification, and control of plant parasitic nematodes. In K. Evans, D. L. Trudgill, & J. M. Webster (Eds.), Plant-parasitic nematodes in temperate agriculture (pp. 1‑59). CAB International.

Hussey, R. S., & Barker, K. R. (1973). A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Disease Reporter, 57, 1025‑1028.

Khatri, K., Peres, N. A., Baggio, J. S., & Boyd, N. S. (2020). Strawberry crop termination, weed control and Macrophomina phaseolina inoculum control with metam potassium at season end. Crop Protection, 135, 105207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105207

Kiewnick, S., Dessimoz, M., and Franck, L.. 2009. Effects of the Mi-1 and N root-knot nematode-resistance gene on infection and reproduction of Meloidogyne enterolobii on tomato and pepper cultivars. Journal of Nematology 41(2), 134-139.

Philbrick, A. N., Adhikari, T. B., Louws, F. J., & Gorny, A. M. (2020). Meloidogyne enterolobii, a major threat to tomato production: Current status and future prospects for its management. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 606395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.606395

Regmi, H., & Desaeger, J. (2020a). Integrated management of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) in Florida tomatoes combining host resistance and nematicides. Crop Protection, 134, 105170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105170

Regmi, H., & Desaeger, J. (2020b). Nematode resistance: A useful tool for root-knot nematode (RKN) management in tomato. EDIS, 2019(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-in1250-2019

Riva, G., Brito, J. A., de Oliveira, C., Marin, M., Gu, M., Bui, H. X., & Desaeger, J. (2024). Identification, distribution, and hosts of Meloidogyne spp. infecting horticultural crops in Florida, USA, with focus on Meloidogyne enterolobii. Journal of Nematology, 56(1), e20240042. https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2024-0042

Rutter, W. B., Wadl, P. A., Mueller, J. D., & Agudelo, P. (2021). Identification of sweet potato germplasm resistant to pathotypically distinct isolates of Meloidogyne enterolobii from the Carolinas. Plant Disease, 105(10), 3147-3153. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-20-0379-RE

Saikai, K., Wanjala, S., Oduori, C., & Coyne, D. (2021). Revisiting the modified Baermann extraction method: Extraction efficiency of Radopholus similis using different extraction materials. Nematology, 23, 1215–1218. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-BJA10130

Seid, A., Fininsa, C., Mekete, T., Decraemer, W., & Wesemael, W. M. L. (2015). Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) – A century‑old battle. Nematology, 17(9), 995‑1009. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-00002935

Shi, M., Liu, R., Madhusanka, D. N., Liu, Y., Luo, N., Guo, W., Zhao, J., Li, H., & Mao, Z. (2025). Emerging threat of Meloidogyne enterolobii: Pathogenicity mechanisms and sustainable management strategies in the context of global change. Microbiology Research, 16(8), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres16080165

Silva, A. J., Oliveira, G. H., Pastoriza, R. J., Maranhão, E. H., Pedrosa, E. M., Maranhão, S. R., Boiteux, L. S., Pinheiro, J. B., & Carvalho Filho, J. L. (2019). Search for sources of resistance to Meloidogyne enterolobii in commercial and wild tomatoes. Horticultura Brasileira, 37(2), 188‑198. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-053620190209

Tylka, G. L. (2022). Protocols: Acid fuchsin stain preparation. Iowa State University. https://faculty.sites.iastate.edu/gltylka/protocols#:~:text=Procedure:,most%20of%20the%20excess%20water

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. (2024). USDA/NASS QuickStats ad-hoc query tool – dataset FB0D60E9-D754-3E23-BBA0-D9D7CA80C79E. https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/results/FB0D60E9-D754-3E23-BBA0-D9D7CA80C79E

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

Issue

Section

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE/ARTICULO ELECTRONICO