Mediated Vicarious Contact with Transgender People: How Narrative Perspective and Interaction Depiction Influence Intergroup Attitudes, Transportation, and Elevation
The emerging intergroup perspective-taking narrative has become a mainstream representational strategy in the rise of transgender media visibility. Taking an experimental design approach, this study investigates how narrative perspective (Ingroup Perspective vs. Outgroup Perspective) interacts with intergroup interaction depiction (Positive vs. Negative) in transgender-related media content to redirect people’s attitudes toward transgender people, transportation, and elevation responses. The findings reveal that the outgroup perspective is more likely to elicit 1) positive attitudes toward the featured transgender character and the transgender outgroup; 2) transportation; and 3) meaningful affect, mixed affect, and motivational responses. However, the positive depiction of transgender-cisgender intergroup interaction only prompts positive attitudes toward the transgender character, meaningful affect, and physical responses. Implications of such intergroup communication strategies in public interest communications are discussed.
Adams, N. (2017, December 14). Honoring known cases of deadly anti-trans violence in 2017. Retrieved from https://www.glaad.org/blog/glaad-calls-increased-and-accurate-media-coverage-transgender-murders.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
Algoe, S. B., & Haidt, J. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: The "other-praising" amotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105-127. doi:10.1080/17439760802650519
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant, & D. Zillmann, Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 61-90). New York: Routledge.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3, 265-299. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2008). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 508–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00397.x
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
Cikara, M., Bruneau, E., Van Bavel, J. J., & Saxe, R. (2014). Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55(2), 110-125. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007
Covert, J., & Dixon, T. L. (2008). A changing view: Representation and effects of the portrayal of women of color in mainstream women’s magazines. Communication Research, 35(2), 232-256. doi:10.1177/0093650207313166
Crano, W. D., & Seyranian, V. (2009). How minorities prevail: The context/comparison-leniency contract model. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 335-363. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01603.x
Crisp, R., & Turner, R. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated contact. American Psychologist, 64(4), 234–240. doi:10.1037/a0014718.
Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2004). Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 175–191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
David, B., & Turner, J.C. (1999). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: The in-group minority in intragroup and intergroup contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 115-134. doi:10.1348/014466699164086
Ersner-Hershfield, H., Mikels, J. A., Sullivan, S. J., & Carstensen, L. L. (2008). Poigancy: Mixed emotional experience in the face of meaningful endings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 158-167. doi:10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.199
Fessmann. J. (2016). The emerging field of public interest communications. In E. Oliveira, A.D. Melo, G. Goncalves (Eds.), Strategic communications for non-profit organizations: Challenges and alternative approaches (pp. 13-33). Wilmington, DE: Vernon.
Fiol, C. M., Harris, D., & House, R. (1999). Charismatic leadership: Strategies for effecting social change. Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 449-482. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00021-1
Fujioka, Y. (1999). Television portrayals and African American stereotypes: Examination of contact effects when direct contact is lacking. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1), 52-75. doi:10.1177/107769909907600105
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. doi:1 0.1037/0022-35188.8.131.521
Hall, A. (2009). Perceptions of the authenticity of reality programs and their relationships to audience involvement, enjoyment, and perceived learning. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(4), 515–531. doi:10.1080/08838150903310468
Harwood, J. (2010). The contact space: A novel framework for intergroup contact research. Journal Of Language & Social Psychology, 29(2), 147-177. doi:10.1177/0261927X09359520
Harwood, J., Qadar, F., & Chen, C. (2016). Harmonious contact: Stories about intergroup musical collaboration improve intergroup attitudes. Journal Of Communication, 66(6), 937-959. doi:10.1111/jcom.12261
Herek, G. M. (1987). The instrumentality of attitudes: Toward a neofunctional theory. Journal of Social Issues, 42(2), 99–114. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00227.x
Joyce, N., & Harwood, J. (2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of ingroup and outgroup information. Communication Research, 41(5), 627. doi:10.1177/0093650212447944
Mastro, D., & Tukachinsky, R. (2011). The influence of exemplar versus prototype-based media primes on racial/ethnic evaluations. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 916-937. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01587.x
Mazziotta, A., Mummendey, A., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 255–274. doi:10.1177/1368430210390533.
Oliver, M. B., Hartmann, T., & Woolley, J. K. (2012). Elevation in response to entertainment portrayals of moral virtue. Human Communication Research, 38(3), 360-378. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01427.x
Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984-1004. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
Ortiz, M., & Harwood, J. (2007). A social cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(4), 615–631. doi:10.1080/08838150701626487
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal Of Personality & Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783. doi:10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.206
Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2011). Review: Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal Of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 271-280. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
Petty, R., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G. Lindsey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2, 323-390. New York, NY: Oxford.
Power, J. G., Murphy, S. T., & Coover, G. (1996). Priming prejudice: How stereotypes and counter-stereotypes influence attribution of responsibility and credibility among ingroups and outgroups. Human Communication Research, 23(1), 36-58. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00386.
Richards, J. (2015, July 14). What trans movement? The Advocate. Retrieved from http://www.advocate.com/print-issue/current-issue/2015/07/14/what-trans-movement
Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 92-115. doi:10.1080/0363775052000342544
Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(4), 15-37. doi: 10.1300/J082v51n04_02
Seyranian, V. (2013). Social identity framing: A strategy of social influence for social change. In R. E. Riggio & S. J. Tan (Eds.), Leader interpersonal and influence skills: The soft skills of leadership (pp. 207-242). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
Seyranian, V. (2017). Public interest communications: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 1(1), 57-77. doi:10.32473/jpic.v1.i1.p57
Silvers, J. A., & Haidt, J. (2008). Moral elevation can induce nursing. Emotion, 8(2), 291-295. doi:10.1037/1528-35220.127.116.111.
Slater, M. D., Rouner, D., & Long, M. (2006). Television dramas and support for controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Communication, 56, 235–252. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00017.x
Stenstrom, D. M., Lickel, B., Denson, T. F., & Miller, N. (2008). The roles of ingroup identification and outgroup entitativity in intergroup retribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1570–1582. doi:10.1177/0146167208322999
Tal-Or, N. (2016). How co-viewing affects attitudes: The mediating roles of transportation and identification, Media Psychology, 19(3), 381-405. doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1082918
Vezzali, L., Hewstone, M., Capozza, D., Giovannini, D., & Wolfer, R. (2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review Of Social Psychology, 25(1), 314-389. doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.982948
Wojcieszak, M., & Azrout, R. (2016). I saw you in the news: Mediated and direct intergroup contact improve outgroup attitudes. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1032-1060. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12266
Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73(1), 73-90. doi:10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.168
Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1985). Selective exposure to communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1977). Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 155–165. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80008-5
Zwarun, L., & Hall, A. (2012). Narrative persuasion, transportation, and the role of need for cognition in online viewing of fantastical films. Media Psychology, 15(3), 327-355.
Authors publishing their work in the Journal of Public Interest Communications retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. By agreeing to these terms, the author(s) grant and assign the following rights to the Publisher:
- The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter discovered, including electronic format.
- The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials, and
- The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website).