Mediated Vicarious Contact with Transgender People: How Narrative Perspective and Interaction Depiction Influence Intergroup Attitudes, Transportation, and Elevation
The emerging intergroup perspective-taking narrative has become a mainstream representational strategy in the rise of transgender media visibility. Taking an experimental design approach, this study investigates how narrative perspective (Ingroup Perspective vs. Outgroup Perspective) interacts with intergroup interaction depiction (Positive vs. Negative) in transgender-related media content to redirect people’s attitudes toward transgender people, transportation, and elevation responses. The findings reveal that the outgroup perspective is more likely to elicit 1) positive attitudes toward the featured transgender character and the transgender outgroup; 2) transportation; and 3) meaningful affect, mixed affect, and motivational responses. However, the positive depiction of transgender-cisgender intergroup interaction only prompts positive attitudes toward the transgender character, meaningful affect, and physical responses. Implications of such intergroup communication strategies in public interest communications are discussed.
Adams, N. (2017, December 14). Honoring known cases of deadly anti-trans violence in 2017. Retrieved from https://www.glaad.org/blog/glaad-calls-increased-and-accurate-media-coverage-transgender-murders.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
Algoe, S. B., & Haidt, J. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: The "other-praising" amotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105-127. doi:10.1080/17439760802650519
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant, & D. Zillmann, Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 61-90). New York: Routledge.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3, 265-299. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2008). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 508–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00397.x
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
Cikara, M., Bruneau, E., Van Bavel, J. J., & Saxe, R. (2014). Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55(2), 110-125. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007
Covert, J., & Dixon, T. L. (2008). A changing view: Representation and effects of the portrayal of women of color in mainstream women’s magazines. Communication Research, 35(2), 232-256. doi:10.1177/0093650207313166
Crano, W. D., & Seyranian, V. (2009). How minorities prevail: The context/comparison-leniency contract model. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 335-363. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01603.x
Crisp, R., & Turner, R. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated contact. American Psychologist, 64(4), 234–240. doi:10.1037/a0014718.
Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2004). Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 175–191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
David, B., & Turner, J.C. (1999). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: The in-group minority in intragroup and intergroup contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 115-134. doi:10.1348/014466699164086
Ersner-Hershfield, H., Mikels, J. A., Sullivan, S. J., & Carstensen, L. L. (2008). Poigancy: Mixed emotional experience in the face of meaningful endings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 158-167. doi:10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.199
Fessmann. J. (2016). The emerging field of public interest communications. In E. Oliveira, A.D. Melo, G. Goncalves (Eds.), Strategic communications for non-profit organizations: Challenges and alternative approaches (pp. 13-33). Wilmington, DE: Vernon.
Fiol, C. M., Harris, D., & House, R. (1999). Charismatic leadership: Strategies for effecting social change. Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 449-482. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00021-1
Fujioka, Y. (1999). Television portrayals and African American stereotypes: Examination of contact effects when direct contact is lacking. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1), 52-75. doi:10.1177/107769909907600105
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. doi:1 0.1037/0022-35188.8.131.521
Hall, A. (2009). Perceptions of the authenticity of reality programs and their relationships to audience involvement, enjoyment, and perceived learning. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(4), 515–531. doi:10.1080/08838150903310468
Harwood, J. (2010). The contact space: A novel framework for intergroup contact research. Journal Of Language & Social Psychology, 29(2), 147-177. doi:10.1177/0261927X09359520
Harwood, J., Qadar, F., & Chen, C. (2016). Harmonious contact: Stories about intergroup musical collaboration improve intergroup attitudes. Journal Of Communication, 66(6), 937-959. doi:10.1111/jcom.12261
Herek, G. M. (1987). The instrumentality of attitudes: Toward a neofunctional theory. Journal of Social Issues, 42(2), 99–114. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00227.x
Joyce, N., & Harwood, J. (2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of ingroup and outgroup information. Communication Research, 41(5), 627. doi:10.1177/0093650212447944
Mastro, D., & Tukachinsky, R. (2011). The influence of exemplar versus prototype-based media primes on racial/ethnic evaluations. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 916-937. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01587.x
Mazziotta, A., Mummendey, A., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 255–274. doi:10.1177/1368430210390533.
Oliver, M. B., Hartmann, T., & Woolley, J. K. (2012). Elevation in response to entertainment portrayals of moral virtue. Human Communication Research, 38(3), 360-378. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01427.x
Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984-1004. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
Ortiz, M., & Harwood, J. (2007). A social cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(4), 615–631. doi:10.1080/08838150701626487
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal Of Personality & Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783. doi:10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.206
Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2011). Review: Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal Of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 271-280. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
Petty, R., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G. Lindsey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2, 323-390. New York, NY: Oxford.
Power, J. G., Murphy, S. T., & Coover, G. (1996). Priming prejudice: How stereotypes and counter-stereotypes influence attribution of responsibility and credibility among ingroups and outgroups. Human Communication Research, 23(1), 36-58. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00386.
Richards, J. (2015, July 14). What trans movement? The Advocate. Retrieved from http://www.advocate.com/print-issue/current-issue/2015/07/14/what-trans-movement
Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 92-115. doi:10.1080/0363775052000342544
Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(4), 15-37. doi: 10.1300/J082v51n04_02
Seyranian, V. (2013). Social identity framing: A strategy of social influence for social change. In R. E. Riggio & S. J. Tan (Eds.), Leader interpersonal and influence skills: The soft skills of leadership (pp. 207-242). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
Seyranian, V. (2017). Public interest communications: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 1(1), 57-77. doi:10.32473/jpic.v1.i1.p57
Silvers, J. A., & Haidt, J. (2008). Moral elevation can induce nursing. Emotion, 8(2), 291-295. doi:10.1037/1528-35220.127.116.111.
Slater, M. D., Rouner, D., & Long, M. (2006). Television dramas and support for controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Communication, 56, 235–252. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00017.x
Stenstrom, D. M., Lickel, B., Denson, T. F., & Miller, N. (2008). The roles of ingroup identification and outgroup entitativity in intergroup retribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1570–1582. doi:10.1177/0146167208322999
Tal-Or, N. (2016). How co-viewing affects attitudes: The mediating roles of transportation and identification, Media Psychology, 19(3), 381-405. doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1082918
Vezzali, L., Hewstone, M., Capozza, D., Giovannini, D., & Wolfer, R. (2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review Of Social Psychology, 25(1), 314-389. doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.982948
Wojcieszak, M., & Azrout, R. (2016). I saw you in the news: Mediated and direct intergroup contact improve outgroup attitudes. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1032-1060. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12266
Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73(1), 73-90. doi:10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.168
Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1985). Selective exposure to communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1977). Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 155–165. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80008-5
Zwarun, L., & Hall, A. (2012). Narrative persuasion, transportation, and the role of need for cognition in online viewing of fantastical films. Media Psychology, 15(3), 327-355.
By submitting to the Journal of Public Interest Communications, the author(s) agree to the terms of the Author Agreement. All authors retain copyrights associated with their article contributions and agree to make such contributions available under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY NC) 4.0 upon publication.
This agreement takes effect upon acceptance of the Submission for publication in JPIC.
- I hereby grant to the University of Florida (“the University”) the non-exclusive right to retain, reproduce and distribute the Submission in whole or in part, in print and electronic format and in any medium. This agreement does not represent a transfer of copyright to the University.
- The University may make and keep multiple copies of the work for purposes of security, backup, preservation and access; and may migrate the work to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation and access.
- I represent and warrant to the University that the work is my original work and that I have the authority as sole author or I have the authority on behalf of my co-authors to grant the rights contained in this agreement. I also represent that the work does not, to the best of my knowledge, infringe or violate any rights of others.
- I further represent and warrant that I have obtained all necessary rights to permit the University to reproduce and distribute the work, including any third-party material. Alternatively, I represent that my use of any third-party material is allowed because the material is not in copyright or I have performed a fair use analysis and reasonably believe my use is permitted. Any content owned by a third party is clearly identified and acknowledged within the work.
- I grant these same rights to the George A. Smathers Libraries at the University of Florida. Additionally, I grant the right to both the University and Smathers Libraries to enter into agreements with third-party entities and the rights necessary to host, print, index and abstract the Submission.
Open Access and Self-Archiving
JPIC follows an open-access publishing model, meaning that all articles will be publicly accessible on the Internet immediately upon publication. I understand that I may share the submitted manuscript (preprint) of the Submission on the Internet at any point before or after publication, with a citation and link to the final version of record to be added as soon as the issue is available. I may disseminate the final peer-reviewed version at any point after publication.
Creative Commons License
JPIC applies a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY NC) 4.0 to encourage sharing and reuse of content and to maximize the impact of published research. By publishing in JPIC, I agree that the terms of this license will be applied to the Submission. Smathers Libraries (email@example.com) may be able to offer additional information.
By granting this license, I acknowledge that I have read and agreed to the terms of this agreement.