Framing “the Public Interest”: Comparing Public Lobbying Campaigns in Four European States
How do lobbyists get their way and what is the consequence for democracy of their strategies? It is frequently asserted that lobbyists appeal to the public interest to strengthen their proposals. This paper empirically corroborates this claim through four case studies cutting across different European cultural clusters and political systems. The paper unpacks how businesses communicatively construct a link between their private interest and the public interest. The findings illustrate the flexibility of the public interest argument and hence also the potential problem. If everything can be made out to be in the public interest, the concept becomes empty and easy to capture for special interests. At the same time, unpacking the communicative construction helps in critically evaluating lobbyists’ claims of working in the public interest.
Anthony, G. (2013). Public interest and three dimensions of judicial review. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 64(2), 125-142.
Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., & Leech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2015). The politics of information: Problem definition and the course of public policy in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L. (1998). Basic interests: The importance of groups in politics and political science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Mahoney, C. (2008). Forum section: The two faces of framing: Individual-level framing and collective issue definition in the European Union. European Union Politics, 9(3), 435-449. doi:10.1177/1465116508093492
Binderkrantz, A. S., Christiansen, P. M., & Pedersen, H. H. (2014). Organisationer i politik [Organizations in politics]. København: Hans Reitzels foralg.
Bitonti, A. (2017). Public affairs and political philosophy. In P. Harris & C. S. Fleischer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of International corporate and public affairs (pp. 151-164). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Boräng, F., Eising, R., Klüver, H., Mahoney, C., Naurin, D., Rasch, D., & Rozbicka, P. (2014). Identifying frames: A comparison of research methods. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 3(2), 188-201. doi:10.1057/iga.2014.12
Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Burchell, C. (2017, February 28). George Bradshaw Address. Retrieved from https://www.raildeliverygroup.com/files/Publications/2017-02_george_bradshaw_address.pdf
Carragee, K. M., & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 241-233. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x
Chapman, B. (2017, January 11). Nutella maker fights back against fears over cancer-causing palm oil. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/nutella-causes-cancer-palm-oil-supermarket-ban-italy-cadburys-a7522291.html
Cochran, C. E. (1974). Political science and "The public interest." The Journal of Politics, 36(2), 327-355. doi:10.2307/2129473
Culpepper, P. D. (2011). Quiet politics and business power: Corporate control in Europe and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Daviter, F. (2007). Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 654-666. doi:10.1080/13501760701314474
Dewey, J. (1935/2000). Liberalism and social action. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Douglass, B. (1980). The common good and the public interest. Political Theory, 8(1), 103-117. doi:10.1177/009059178000800108
Drutman, L. (2015). The business of America is lobbying: How corporations became politicized and politics became more corporate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
European Parliament. (2017, April 4). Palm oil and deforestation. European Parliament resolution of 4 April 2017 on palm oil and deforestation of rainforests (2016/2222(INI). Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&reference=A8-2017-0066&language=EN
Federal Administrative Court. (2016). Urteil vom 15. Juni 2016, A-7874/2015 [Verdict from 15th June 2016, A-7874/2015]. St. Gallen, CH: Federal Administrative Court.
Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland. (2017). Urteil vom 27. September 2017, 1C_394/2016. [Verdict from 27th September 2017, 1C_394/2016]. Lausanne, CH: Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland.
Feintuck, M. (2004). 'The public interest' in regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ferrero (2016). C’e’ olio e olio. Il nostro è olio di palma Ferrero. Retrieved from https://qualita.ferrero.it/olio-di-palma.html
Ferrero. (2017a). Olio di Palma. Le Materie Prime. Retrieved from https://qualita.ferrero.it/olio-di-palma.html
Ferrero. (2017b, May 20). Sharing values to create value. Retrieved from https://www.ferrero.com/social-responsibility/share-values-to-create-value
Ferrero (2017c, March 30). Olio di palma: 7 luoghi comuni da sfattare. Il Corriere. Retreived from http://www.corriere.it/native-adv/ferrero-longform01-olio-di-palma-7-luoghi-comuni-da-sfatare.shtml?refresh_ce-cp
Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(03), 564-581. doi:10.1017/s1537592714001595
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: de Gruyter.
Griffiths, M. (2015, August 12). How have Britain’s railways transformed? Retrieved from https://www.raildeliverygroup.com/component/arkhive/?task=file.download&id=469762636
Griseri, P. (2016a, October 26). Sì o no all’olio di palma: ora la sfida è a colpi di spot. La Repubblica. Retrieved from http://www.repubblica.it/sapori/2016/10/28/news/olio_palma_guerra_polemica_barilla-150758447/
Griseri, P. (2016b, October 27). La Nutella difende l'olio di Palma. E il ministero dell'agricoltura la appoggia. La Repubblica. Retreived from http://www.repubblica.it/economia/2016/10/27/news/la_nutelle_difende_l_olio_di_palma_e_il_ministero_dell_agricoltura_la_appoggia-150697103/?refresh_ce
Gupta, V., Hanges, P. J., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Cultural clusters: methodology and findings. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 11-15. doi:10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00070-0
Hallahan, K. (2011). Political public relations and strategic framing. In J. Strömbäck & S. Kiousis (Eds.), Political public relations (pp. 177-213). London: Routledge.
Johnston, J. (2016). Public relations and the public interest. New York, NY: Routledge.
Klassekampen. (2014, February 12). Angriper Vinmonopolet. Klassekampen. Retrieved from http://www.klassekampen.no/article/20141202/ARTICLE/141209988
Klüver, H., Mahoney, C., & Opper, M. (2015). Framing in context: How interest groups employ framing to lobby the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(4), 481-498. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1008550
Kroger/Greenpeace International News. (2015, June 18). #NutellaGate and the trade in deforestation. Retrieved from http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/nutella-palm-oil-deforestation/blog/53269/
Kuypers, J. A. (2009). Framing analysis from a rhetorical perspective. In P. D'Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 286-311). New York, NY: Routledge.
La Repubblica (2017, December 11). I nutrizionisti dicono di sì è meno dannoso per l’ambiente. Retrieved from http://www.repubblica.it/economia/affari-e-finanza/2017/12/11/news/i_nutrizionisti_dicono_di_s_meno_dannoso_per_lambiente-183742954/
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. London: Yale University Press.
Lindsey, B., & Teles, S. (2017). The captured economy: How the powerful enrich themselves, slow down growth, and increase inequality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lippmann, W. (1955). Essays in the public philosophy. London: Transaction Publishers.
Mahoney, C. (2008). Brussels versus the beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union: Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
McGrath, C. (2007). Framing lobbying messages: Defining and communicating political issues persuasively. Journal of Public Affairs, 7(3), 269-280. doi:10.1002/pa.267
Naurin, D. (2007). Deliberation behind closed doors: Transparency and lobbying in the European Union. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
Oberman, W. D. (2017). Lobbying resources and strategies. In P. Harris & C. S. Fleischer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of International corporate and public affairs (pp. 483-497). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Oslo-Economics. (2015). Etterspørselvirkninger av å avvikle duty-free [Demand consequencs of abolisihing duty free]. Retrieved from http://osloeconomics.no/wp-content/uploads/Rapport-2015_14-Ettersp%C3%B8rselsvirkninger-av-%C3%A5-avvikle-duty-free.pdf
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35-65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rail Delivery Group. (2014). Running a better railway. Retrieved from docplayer.net/42266549-Rail-delivery-group-running-a-better-railway.html
Rail Delivery Group. (2015). Working together: Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.raildeliverygroup.com/files/Publications/2015-10_rdg_annual_report.pdf
Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (Eds.). (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas.
Rokkan, S., & Valen, H. (1964). Regional contrasts in Norwegian politics. In E. Allardt & Y. Littunen (Eds.), Cleavages, ideologies and party system. Helsinki: Westermarck Society.
Rommetvedt, H. (2011). Politikkens allmenngjøring og den nypluralistiske parlamentarismen [The general application of politics and the new plurlalism of parliamentarism] (2 ed.). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033-1053. doi:10.2307/1958356
Schiappa, E. (2003). Defining reality: Definitions and the politics of meaning. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Simm, K. (2011). The concepts of common good and public interest: From Plato to biobanking. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20(4), 554-562. doi:10.1017/S0963180111000296
Trapp, N. L., & Laursen, B. (2017). Inside out: interest groups’ ‘outside’ media work as a means to manage ‘inside’ lobbying efforts and relationships with politicians. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 6(2), 143-160. doi:10.1057/s41309-017-0016-y
Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60-78. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00329.x
Vliegenthart, R., & van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 101-115. doi:10.1177/0267323111404838
Authors publishing their work in the Journal of Public Interest Communications retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. By agreeing to these terms, the author(s) grant and assign the following rights to the Publisher:
- The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter discovered, including electronic format.
- The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials, and
- The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website).