Framing “the Public Interest”: Comparing Public Lobbying Campaigns in Four European States


  • Oyvind Ihlen
  • Ketil Raknes
  • Ian Somerville
  • Chiara Valentini
  • Charlotte Stachel
  • Irina Lock
  • Scott Davidson
  • Peter Seele



Lobbying, Public Interest, Framing


How do lobbyists get their way and what is the consequence for democracy of their strategies? It is frequently asserted that lobbyists appeal to the public interest to strengthen their proposals. This paper empirically corroborates this claim through four case studies cutting across different European cultural clusters and political systems. The paper unpacks how businesses communicatively construct a link between their private interest and the public interest. The findings illustrate the flexibility of the public interest argument and hence also the potential problem. If everything can be made out to be in the public interest, the concept becomes empty and easy to capture for special interests. At the same time, unpacking the communicative construction helps in critically evaluating lobbyists’ claims of working in the public interest.


Anthony, G. (2013). Public interest and three dimensions of judicial review. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 64(2), 125-142.

Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., & Leech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2015). The politics of information: Problem definition and the course of public policy in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L. (1998). Basic interests: The importance of groups in politics and political science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Baumgartner, F. R., & Mahoney, C. (2008). Forum section: The two faces of framing: Individual-level framing and collective issue definition in the European Union. European Union Politics, 9(3), 435-449. doi:10.1177/1465116508093492

Binderkrantz, A. S., Christiansen, P. M., & Pedersen, H. H. (2014). Organisationer i politik [Organizations in politics]. København: Hans Reitzels foralg.

Bitonti, A. (2017). Public affairs and political philosophy. In P. Harris & C. S. Fleischer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of International corporate and public affairs (pp. 151-164). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Boräng, F., Eising, R., Klüver, H., Mahoney, C., Naurin, D., Rasch, D., & Rozbicka, P. (2014). Identifying frames: A comparison of research methods. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 3(2), 188-201. doi:10.1057/iga.2014.12

Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Burchell, C. (2017, February 28). George Bradshaw Address. Retrieved from

Carragee, K. M., & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 241-233. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x

Chapman, B. (2017, January 11). Nutella maker fights back against fears over cancer-causing palm oil. Retrieved from

Cochran, C. E. (1974). Political science and "The public interest." The Journal of Politics, 36(2), 327-355. doi:10.2307/2129473

Culpepper, P. D. (2011). Quiet politics and business power: Corporate control in Europe and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Daviter, F. (2007). Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 654-666. doi:10.1080/13501760701314474

Dewey, J. (1935/2000). Liberalism and social action. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

Douglass, B. (1980). The common good and the public interest. Political Theory, 8(1), 103-117. doi:10.1177/009059178000800108

Drutman, L. (2015). The business of America is lobbying: How corporations became politicized and politics became more corporate. New York: Oxford University Press.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

European Parliament. (2017, April 4). Palm oil and deforestation. European Parliament resolution of 4 April 2017 on palm oil and deforestation of rainforests (2016/2222(INI). Retrieved from

Federal Administrative Court. (2016). Urteil vom 15. Juni 2016, A-7874/2015 [Verdict from 15th June 2016, A-7874/2015]. St. Gallen, CH: Federal Administrative Court.

Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland. (2017). Urteil vom 27. September 2017, 1C_394/2016. [Verdict from 27th September 2017, 1C_394/2016]. Lausanne, CH: Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland.

Feintuck, M. (2004). 'The public interest' in regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ferrero (2016). C’e’ olio e olio. Il nostro è olio di palma Ferrero. Retrieved from

Ferrero. (2017a). Olio di Palma. Le Materie Prime. Retrieved from

Ferrero. (2017b, May 20). Sharing values to create value. Retrieved from

Ferrero (2017c, March 30). Olio di palma: 7 luoghi comuni da sfattare. Il Corriere. Retreived from

Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(03), 564-581. doi:10.1017/s1537592714001595

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: de Gruyter.

Griffiths, M. (2015, August 12). How have Britain’s railways transformed? Retrieved from

Griseri, P. (2016a, October 26). Sì o no all’olio di palma: ora la sfida è a colpi di spot. La Repubblica. Retrieved from

Griseri, P. (2016b, October 27). La Nutella difende l'olio di Palma. E il ministero dell'agricoltura la appoggia. La Repubblica. Retreived from

Gupta, V., Hanges, P. J., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Cultural clusters: methodology and findings. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 11-15. doi:10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00070-0

Hallahan, K. (2011). Political public relations and strategic framing. In J. Strömbäck & S. Kiousis (Eds.), Political public relations (pp. 177-213). London: Routledge.

Johnston, J. (2016). Public relations and the public interest. New York, NY: Routledge.

Klassekampen. (2014, February 12). Angriper Vinmonopolet. Klassekampen. Retrieved from

Klüver, H., Mahoney, C., & Opper, M. (2015). Framing in context: How interest groups employ framing to lobby the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(4), 481-498. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1008550

Kroger/Greenpeace International News. (2015, June 18). #NutellaGate and the trade in deforestation. Retrieved from

Kuypers, J. A. (2009). Framing analysis from a rhetorical perspective. In P. D'Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 286-311). New York, NY: Routledge.

La Repubblica (2017, December 11). I nutrizionisti dicono di sì è meno dannoso per l’ambiente. Retrieved from

Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. London: Yale University Press.

Lindsey, B., & Teles, S. (2017). The captured economy: How the powerful enrich themselves, slow down growth, and increase inequality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lippmann, W. (1955). Essays in the public philosophy. London: Transaction Publishers.

Mahoney, C. (2008). Brussels versus the beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union: Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

McGrath, C. (2007). Framing lobbying messages: Defining and communicating political issues persuasively. Journal of Public Affairs, 7(3), 269-280. doi:10.1002/pa.267

Naurin, D. (2007). Deliberation behind closed doors: Transparency and lobbying in the European Union. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.

Oberman, W. D. (2017). Lobbying resources and strategies. In P. Harris & C. S. Fleischer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of International corporate and public affairs (pp. 483-497). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Oslo-Economics. (2015). Etterspørselvirkninger av å avvikle duty-free [Demand consequencs of abolisihing duty free]. Retrieved from

Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35-65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Rail Delivery Group. (2014). Running a better railway. Retrieved from

Rail Delivery Group. (2015). Working together: Annual Report. Retrieved from

Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (Eds.). (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas.

Rokkan, S., & Valen, H. (1964). Regional contrasts in Norwegian politics. In E. Allardt & Y. Littunen (Eds.), Cleavages, ideologies and party system. Helsinki: Westermarck Society.

Rommetvedt, H. (2011). Politikkens allmenngjøring og den nypluralistiske parlamentarismen [The general application of politics and the new plurlalism of parliamentarism] (2 ed.). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033-1053. doi:10.2307/1958356

Schiappa, E. (2003). Defining reality: Definitions and the politics of meaning. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Simm, K. (2011). The concepts of common good and public interest: From Plato to biobanking. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20(4), 554-562. doi:10.1017/S0963180111000296

Trapp, N. L., & Laursen, B. (2017). Inside out: interest groups’ ‘outside’ media work as a means to manage ‘inside’ lobbying efforts and relationships with politicians. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 6(2), 143-160. doi:10.1057/s41309-017-0016-y

Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60-78. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00329.x

Vliegenthart, R., & van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 101-115. doi:10.1177/0267323111404838






Original Research