Clearcut Persuasion? Audience Cognition of Mediated Environmental Advertising through the Lens of the Elaboration Likelihood Model
Through the theoretical lens of Petty and Cacioppo’s Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and using the case of Oregon Wild and its campaign against clear-cut logging on public lands, this study explores the impact of media coverage of contentious activist advertising on audiences. A survey with experimental conditions measures attitudes of audiences exposed to this interplay of advocacy communication. The study assesses partiality toward the sponsor organization, a willingness by the target audience to act on its behalf, and an understanding of the central environmental issue. Differences between gender in reception of the campaign and coverage also are examined. By examining the interplay of social advertising, news media, and audiences, this study highlights a dynamic, social psychological stream of public interest communications.
Atheist bus campaign. (2018). Humanists UK. Retrieved from https://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/successful-campaigns/atheist-bus-campaign/
Banerjee, S., Gulas, C. S., & Iyer, E. (1995). Shades of green: A multidimensional analysis of environmental advertising. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 21–31. doi:10.1080/00913367.1995.10673473
Bator, R. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: The application of persuasion theory to the development of effective proenvironmental public service announcements. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 527–541. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00182
Beeler, C. (2017). How to get the conservative climate message to Trump? Put it on TV. Public Radio International. Retrieved from https://www.pri.org/stories/2017-05-01/how-get-conservative-climate-message-trump-put-it-tv
Berry, T. R., Wharf-Higgins, J., & Naylor, P. J. (2007). SARS wars: an examination of the quantity and construction of health information in the news media. Health communication, 21(1), 35-44. doi:10.1080/10410230701283322
Bitner, M. J., & Obermiller, C. (1985). The elaboration likelihood model: Limitations and extensions in marketing. Advances in consumer research, 12, 420-425.
Blum, E. D. (2008). Love canal revisited: race, class, and gender in environmental activism. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Booth-Butterfield, S., & Welbourne, J. (2002). The elaboration likelihood model: Its impact on persuasion theory and research. In S. Booth-Butterfield & J.Welbourne (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 155-173). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bord, R. J., & O'Connor, R. E. (1997). The gender gap in environmental attitudes: The case of perceived vulnerability to risk. Social Science Quarterly, 78(4), 830-840.
Brown, T. J., Ham, S. H., and Hughes, M. (2010). Picking up litter: An application of theory-based communication to influence tourist behaviour in protected areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(7), 879–900. doi:10.1080/09669581003721281
Budgen, M. (2017, November 16). Greenpeace’s Jennifer Morgan. We need to hold politicians who put fossil fuels before people accountable. Lifegate. Retrieved from https://www.lifegate.com/people/news/jennifer-morgan-greenpeace-cop23-interview
Buttel, F. H. (1979). Age and environmental concern: A multivariate analysis. Youth & Society, 10(3), 237-256. doi:10.1177/0044118X7901000302
Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Chen, X., Peterson, M. N., Hull, V., Lu, C., Lee, G. D., Hong, D., & Liu, J. (2011). Effects of attitudinal and sociodemographic factors on pro-environmental behaviour in urban China. Environmental Conservation, 38(1), 45-52.
Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01242
Choi, Y. J. (2011). Do central processing and online processing always concur? Analysis of scene order and proportion effects in broadcast news. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 567-575. doi:10.1002/acp.1721
Cole, C., Ettenson, R., Reinke, S., & Schrader, T. (1990). The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM): Replications, extensions and some conflicting findings. Advances in Consumer Research. 17(1), 231-236.
Coleman, R. (2006). The effects of visuals on ethical reasoning: What's a photograph worth to journalists making moral decisions?. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 835-850. doi:10.1177/107769900608300407
Conner, A., & Epstein, K. (2007). Harnessing purity and pragmatism. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(4), 61-65.
Cook, E. (1990). Global environmental advocacy: Citizen activism in protecting the ozone layer. Ambio, 19(6/7), 334-338.
Dahl, D. W., Frankenberger, K. D., & Manchanda, R. V. (2003). Does it pay to shock? Reactions to shocking and nonshocking advertising content among university students. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(03), 268–280. doi:10.1017/S0021849903030332
Davenport, C., & Parker, A. (2014, October 21). Environment is grabbing big role in ads for campaigns. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/22/us/politics/environmental-issues-become-a-force-in-political-advertising.html
Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28(3), 302-339. doi:10.1177/0013916596283003
DeLuca, K. M. (2005). Thinking with Heidegger: Rethinking environmental theory and practice. Ethics and the Environment, 10(1), 67-87. doi:10.1353/een.2005.0013
Demetrious, K. (2017). Contemporary publics, Twitter and the story of PR: Exploring corporate interventions to promote “clean coal” in Australia. The Journal of Public Interest Communications, 1(1), 94-114.
Dery, M. (1993). Culture jamming: Hacking, slashing and sniping in the empire of signs. Westfield, NJ: Open Media.
Donahue, S. (2004). How clean are green ads? Evaluating environmental advertising in contemporary media. Booth Prize Essays 2004/2005. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/boothe/0405/PWR-Donahue.pdf
Fortmann, L., and Kusel, J. (1990). New voices, old beliefs: Forest environmentalism among new and long‐standing rural residents. Rural Sociology, 55(2), 214-232. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1990.tb00681.x
Friestad, M., and Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31. doi:10.1086/209380
Fry, R. (2016, April 25). Millennials overtake Baby Boomers as America’s largest generation. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/04/25/millennials-overtake-baby-boomers/
Griffin, E. M. (2012). A first look at communication theory (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Harold, C. (2004). Pranking rhetoric: “Culture jamming” as media activism. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 21(3), 189-211. doi:10.1080/0739318042000212693
Heath, R. L. (1988). The rhetoric of issue advertising: A rationale, a case study, a critical perspective—and more. Central States Speech Journal, 39(2), 99–109. doi:10.1080/10510978809363241
Hubbard, R. C. (1993). Shock advertising: The Benetton case. Studies in Popular Culture, 16(1), 39–51.
Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta- analysis. Psychological bulletin, 106(2), 290. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.290
Joireman, J., & Liu, R. L. (2014). Future-oriented women will pay to reduce global warming:Mediation via political orientation, environmental values, and belief in global warming. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 391-400. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.005
Klein, N. (2000). "Culture jamming: Ads under attack." Brandweek 41(28), 28-35.
Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Larson, C. U. (2013). Persuasion: Reception and responsibility (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Lasn, H. (1993). Culture jam: The uncooling of America. New York, NY: Eagle Brook.
Levinson, J. C. (1984). Guerilla marketing: How to make big profits in your small business. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Lewis, S. C. (2008). Where young adults intend to get news in five years. Newspaper Research Journal, 29(4), 36-52. doi:10.1177/073953290802900404
Lyttle, J. (2001). The effectiveness of humor in persuasion: The case of business ethics training. The Journal of General Psychology, 128(2), 206–216. doi:10.1080/00221300109598908
McCright, A. M. (2010). The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment, 32(1), 66-87. doi:10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1
McCright, A. M., and Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Mohai, P., & Twight, B. W. (1987). Age and environmentalism: An elaboration of the Buttel model using national survey evidence. Social Science Quarterly, 68(4), 798.
Port of Portland’s Billboard Brouhaha: Editorial. (2013, September 22). The Oregonian. Retrieved from http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2013/09/port_of_portlands_billboard_br.html
Petty, R. E., Brinol, P. & Priester, J.R. (2009). Mass media attitude change: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In J. Bryant & M.B. Oliver. Media Effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed.) (pp. 141-180). London: Routledge.
Pettry, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 93-130). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Pickerel, W., Jorgensen, H., & Bennett, L. (2002). Culture jams and meme warfare: Kalle Lasn, Adbusters, and media activism. Center for Communication and Civic Engagement. Retrieved from: http://depts.washington.edu/ccce/research/WendiResearch.htm
Polakovic, G. (2012, June 13). Are women greener than men? Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jun/13/opinion/la-oe-polakovic-gender-and-the-environment-20120613
Samdahl, D. M., & Robertson, R. (1989). Social determinants of environmental concern: Specification and test of the model. Environment and Behavior, 21(1), 57-81. doi:10.1177/0013916589211004
Schumann, D. W., Kotowski, M. R., Ahn, H. Y., & Haugtvedt, C. P. (2012). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: A 30-year review. In S. Rodgers 7 E. Thorson (Eds.), Advertising Theory (pp. 51–68). New York, NY: Routledge.
Seyranian, V. (2017). Public Interest Communications: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 1(1), 57-77.
Shanahan, J., Pelstring, L., and McComas, K. (1999). Using narratives to think about environmental attitude and behavior: An exploratory study. Society and Natural Resources, 12(5), 405-419. doi:10.1080/089419299279506
Shortis, E. (2018). ‘In the interest of all mankind’: Women and the environmental protection of Antarctica. In L. Stevens, P. Tait, & D. Varney (Eds.), Feminist Ecologies (pp. 247-261). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment—education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173-191. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
Sugden, K. (2012). Benetton backlash: Does controversy sell sweaters? Advertising and Society Review, 13(1). Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/advertising_and_society_review/v013/13.1.sugden.html
Sweney, M. (2007, May 16). Anti-smoking ads hooked off air. The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/may/16/advertising.uknews
Thorson, E., Wicks, R., & Leshner, G. (2012). Experimental methodology in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(1), 112-124. doi:10.1177/1077699011430066
Treise, D., Weigold, M. F., Conna, J., and Garrison, H. (1994). Ethics in advertising: Ideological correlates of consumer perceptions. Journal of Advertising, 23(3), 59–69. doi:10.1080/00913367.1994.10673450
Veer, E., Tutty, M., and Willemse, J. (2008). It’s time to quit: Using advertising to encourage smoking cessation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 16(4), 315–325. doi:10.1080/09652540802264090
Waller, D. S. (2005). A proposed response model for controversial advertising. Journal of Promotion Management, 11(2-3), 3–15. doi:10.1300/J057v11n02_02
Weaver, C. K. (2010). Carnivalesque activism as a public relations genre: A case study of the New Zealand group Mothers Against Genetic Engineering. Public Relations Review, 36, 35-41. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.09.001
White, M. (2012). Advertising misfires. Time Magazine. Retrieved from: http://business.time.com/2012/07/05/what-were-they-thinking-10-ads-that-sparked-controversy/
Wymer, W. (2010). Rethinking the boundaries of social marketing: Activism or advertising? Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 99-103. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.02.003
Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2015). Gender differences in environmental concern: Revisiting the institutional trust hypothesis in the USA. Environment and Behavior, 47(1), 17-37.
Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443-457. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.0017
Zelezny, L. C., & Schultz, P. W. (2000). Promoting environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 365–371. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00172
Authors publishing their work in the Journal of Public Interest Communications retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. By agreeing to these terms, the author(s) grant and assign the following rights to the Publisher:
- The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter discovered, including electronic format.
- The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials, and
- The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website).