Time spent standing as indicator for benefit from core stabilization program in patients with spine pain: preliminary prediction from a case series
Background/Purpose: A large number of patients seek physical therapy for spine pain (low back pain, cervical pain, or both). Due to variability and differing demographics, patients sometimes fail to fit neatly into a treatment-based classification category. The purpose of this study was to describe which variables would potentially enable a therapist to predict if a patient with spine pain would benefit from a stabilization exercise program.
Measures/Interventions: Patients with spine pain for greater than 3 months were included. Predictive and outcome variables were recorded and patients were each given a similar spinal stabilization program. T-test and correlation tests were performed after 4 weeks to determine which variables could potentially predict improvement.
Outcomes: Only the amount of time spent standing in a day showed an association to improvement (p-value < 0.05). The average time spent standing for the improved group was 167 minutes and 50 minutes for the non-improved group. The LSI and the Orebro showed no association with the Double Leg Lower test, but did demonstrate a positive correlation with pain scores.
Conclusion: How long a patient stood during a typical day was the only variable that had an association with improvement following a 4-week spinal stabilization program. The group that improved spent more time standing than the non-improved group. Future studies could utilize these findings to determine if the results are consistent in larger sample sizes, and whether there are cutoff values for standing times.Clinical Relevance: If standing times truly are predictive of improvement with a stabilization program, prescription of standing could be utilized to improve outcomes in patients with spinal pain.
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).