Vol. 123 (2010): Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society
Vegetable

Effect of Added Elemental Sulfur on Soil pH and Phosphorus Availability in Sandy Soils

Photos: Florida contains over half the wild orchid species found in the United States, at roughly 100 species. The endangered Ghost Orchid (Dendrophylax lindenii) makes its home in the area of southern Florida known as the Big Cypress Swamp (including the

Published 2010-12-01

Keywords

  • tomato,
  • green bean,
  • soil testing,
  • calcium,
  • sandy soils

Abstract

Phosphorus precipitates out of soil solution and becomes unavailable for plant uptake as soil pH and Ca content increases. The reduced P plant availability in soils with pH >7.0 and Ca concentrations >1000 mg·L–1 renders soil tests using Mehlich 1 extractant ineffective because the acids that make up this extractant can dissolve precipitated P and reflect soil P concentrations not available to plants. The effect of lowering soil pH with S to increase plant availability of fertilizer P is of interest to growers, environmentalists, regulators, and the general public because of improved P availability to crop plants and possible impact of increased S concentrations on the environment. The objective of this field study was to determine the length of time soil pH was reduced by application of S in polyethylene-mulched beds and the subsequent affect on growth and productivity of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Sulfur was applied to two selected fields at two rates in combination with four P rates. It was determined that the soil pH reduction from the initial S applications rates equivalent to 280 and 560 kg of S per hectare applied only in the planted row lasted less than 60 days and had minimum effect on P availability during the entire crop growing season.

References

  1. Bieleski, R.L. 1973. Phosphate pools, phosphate transport, and phosphate availability. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24:225–252.
  2. Cushman, K.E. 2005. Basin vegetable production best management practices. Citrus and Veg. Mag. 69(12):20.
  3. Gartley, K.L. and J.T. Sims. 1994. Phosphorus soil testing: environmental uses and implications. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 25:1565–1582.
  4. Graetz, D.A. and V.D. Nair. 1995. Fate of phosphorus in Florida Spodosols contaminated with cattle manure. Ecol. Eng. 5:163–181.
  5. Morgan, K.T., S. Sato, and E. McAvoy. 2009. Preliminary data on phosphorus soil test index validation in Southwest Florida. Proc. Fla. State. Hort. Soc. 122:233–239.
  6. Nair, V.D. and W.G. Harris. 2004. A capacity factor as an alternative to soil test phosphorus in phosphorus risk assessment. New Zealand J. Agr. Res. 47:491–497.
  7. Olsen, S.M., and Santos, B. 2010 Vegetable production handbook for Florida. University of Florida, Gainesville.
  8. Rhue, R.D. and P.H. Everett. 1987. Response of tomatoes to lime and phosphorus on a sandy soil. Agron. J. 79:71–77.
  9. South Florida Water Management District. 2006. 2007 Draft South Florida environmental report. West Palm Beach, FL.
  10. South Florida Water Management District. 2009. 2010 Draft South Florida environmental report. West Palm Beach, FL.
  11. Zhang, M.K., Z.L. He, D.V. Calvert, P.J. Stoffella, Y.C. Li, and E.M. Lamb. 2002. Release potential of phosphorus in Florida sandy soils in relation to phosphorus fractions and adsorption capacity. J. Environ. Sci. Health (Part A) 37:793–809.