Vol. 123 (2010): Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society
Citrus

Estimating Relative Nutrient Uptake by Mature Citrus Trees in Field Conditions

Photos: Florida contains over half the wild orchid species found in the United States, at roughly 100 species. The endangered Ghost Orchid (Dendrophylax lindenii) makes its home in the area of southern Florida known as the Big Cypress Swamp (including the

Published 2010-12-01

Keywords

  • Advanced Citrus Production System (ACPS),
  • Open Hydroponics System (OHS),
  • frequent fertigation,
  • nutrient depletion method

Abstract

Knowledge of nutrient uptake rates by tree roots is of fundamental importance to develop a citrus fertilization program. However, measuring the nutrient uptake by mature trees in field conditions is difficult. Nutrient uptake by intact roots of mature citrus trees was estimated using the nutrient depletion method, wherein intact roots were separated from the soil and placed in a nutrient solution of known composition. Thereafter, the nutrient concentrations of the solution were measured at a series of time intervals (0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 144 h) to determine the nutrient depletion curve. The solution volume was maintained with deionized water using constant head Mariotte tubes. Our results showed that the diurnal and seasonal changes in soil temperature and evapotranspiration were responsible for the corresponding variations in nutrient uptake. The time periods, determined by inflection points, beyond which further nutrient uptake was negligible were very low (12–51 h) for different months, revealing that the nutrient uptake by roots is very fast for the first few hours and is negligible after a certain level of depletion is reached. These results suggested the need of frequent small fertigations to supply the tree roots with a continuous source of nutrients to sustain high uptake rates, to prevent nutrient losses to the environment, and to increase nutrient use efficiency. Relative uptake of different nutrient ions also varied across different months. Collectively, our results provide a basis for the development of guidelines for fertigation in an Advanced Citrus Production System and fertilizer formulations to meet the plant’s requirements.

References

  1. Allen, R.G., L.S.Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  2. Bevington, K.B. and W.S. Castle. 1986. Root growth studies on citrus. Acta Hort. 175:63–66.
  3. Campbell, C.A., F. Selles, R.P. Zentner, and B.G. McConkey. 1998. Nitrogen management for zero-till spring wheat: Disposition in plant and utilization efficiency. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 24:2223–2239.
  4. Campion, J.M. and M.C. Scholes. 2007. Diagnosing foliar nutrient dynamics of Eucalyptus grandis in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, using optimal element ratios and the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Southern Hemisphere For. J. 69:137–150.
  5. Claassen N. and S.A. Barber. 1974. A method for characterizing the relation between nutrient concentration and flux into roots of intact plants. Plant Physiol. 54:564–568.
  6. Escamilla, J.A. and N.B. Comerford. 1998. A method for measuring nutrient depletion by roots of mature trees in the field. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 62:797–804.
  7. Eissenstat D.M. and D.S. Anchor. 1999. Anatomical characteristics of roots of citrus rootstocks that vary in specific root length. New Phytol. 141:309–321.
  8. Florida Automated Weather Network (FAWN). University of Florida IFAS Ext. <http://fawn.ifas.ufl.edu/>.
  9. Hardy, S. and T. Khurshid. 2007. Calculating heat units for citrus. Profitable and sustainable primary industries. Primefact 749.
  10. Jiang, Z. and R.J. Hull. 1998. Interrelationships of nitrate uptake, the low N concentrations of reclaimed water are not nitrate reductase, and nitrogen use efficiency in selected Kentucky bluegrass cultivars. Crop Sci. 38:1623–1632.
  11. Jifon, J.L. and J.P. Syvertsen. 2003. Moderate shade can increase net gas exchange and reduce photoinhibition in citrus leaves. Tree Physiol. 23:119–127.
  12. Lucash M.S., J.D. Joslin, and R.D. Yanai 2005. Temporal variation in nutrient uptake capacity by intact roots of mature loblolly pine. Plant Soil 272:253–262.
  13. Lucash, M.S., D.M. Eissenstat, J.D. Joslin, K.J. McFarlane, and R.D. Yanai. 2007. Estimating nutrient uptake by mature tree roots under field conditions: challenges and opportunities. Trees 21:593–603.
  14. McFarlane, K.J. and R.D. Yanai. 2006. Measuring nitrogen and phosphorus uptake by intact roots of mature Acer saccharum Marsh., Pinus resinosa Ait., and Picea abies (L.) Karst. Plant Soil. 279:163–172.
  15. Morgan, K., D. Kadyampakeni, A. Schumann, W. Castle, E. Stover, P. Spyke, F. Roka, F.R. Muraro, and A. Morris. 2009. Citrus production systems to survive greening—Horticultural practices. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 122:114–121.
  16. Obreza, T.A., M. Zekri, and H.F. Stephen. 2008. General soil fertility and citrus tree nutrition, p. 16–22. In: T.A. Obreza and K.L. Morgan (eds.). Nutrition of Florida citrus trees, 2nd Ed. Fla. Coop. Ext. Serv. SL253. 16 Feb. 2009. . Univ. of Fla. Inst. Food and Agr. Sci., Gainesville.
  17. Poerwanto, R., H. Inoue, and I. Kataoka. 1989. Effects of temperature on the morphology and physiology of the roots of trifoliate orange budded with Satsuma mandarin. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 58:267–274.
  18. Ribeiro R.V., E.C. Machado, M.G. Santos, and R.F. Oliveira. 2009. Seasonal and diurnal changes in photosynthetic limitation of young sweet orange trees. Environ. Expt. Bot. 66:203–211.
  19. Roka, F., R. Muraro, A. Morris, P. Spyke, K. Morgan, A. Schumann, W. Castle, and E. Stover. 2009. Citrus production systems to survive greening—Economic thresholds. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 122:122–126.
  20. Scholberg, J.M.S, L.R. Parsons, T.A. Wheaton, K.T. Morgan, and B.L. McNeal. 2002. Soil temperature, N concentration, and residence time affect nitrogen uptake efficiency of citrus. J. Environ. Qual. 31:759–768.
  21. Schumann, A.W., K. Hostler, K.K. Mann, and L. Waldo. 2009. Advanced citrus production systems: managing for productivity. Citrus Ind. 90:7–9.
  22. Schumann A.W., K. Hostler, W. Waldo, and K.K. Mann. 2010. Update on advanced citrus production system research in Florida. Citrus Ind. 91:6–11.
  23. Schumann, A.W. and M.E. Sumner. 1999. Plant nutrient availability from mixtures of fly ashes and biosolids. J. Environ. Quality 28:1651–1657.
  24. Schumann, A.W. and M.E. Sumner. 2004. Formulation of environmentally sound waste mixtures for land application. Water, Air, Soil Pollut .152:195–217.
  25. Silberbush, M. and J. Ben-Asher. 2001. Simulation study of nutrient uptake by plants from soilless cultures as affected by salinity buildup and transpiration. Plant Soil 233:59–69.
  26. Skene, K.R., J.A. Raven, and J.I. Sprent. 1998. Cluster root development in Grevillea robusta (Proteaceae) I. Xylem, pericycle, cortex, and epidermis development in a determinate root. New Phytol. 138:725–732.
  27. Smith, P.F. and W. Reuther. 1949. Observations on boron deficiency in citrus. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 62:31–37.
  28. Statistical Analysis System Institute. 2003. SAS/STAT guide for personal computers. Version 9.1. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
  29. Stoltzfus, R.M.B., H.G. Taber, and A.S. Aiello. 1998. Effect of increasing root-zone temperature on growth and nutrient uptake by ‘Gold Star’ muskmelon plants. J. Plant Nutr. 21:321–328.
  30. Stover, E., W.S. Castle, and P. Spyke. 2008. The citrus grove of the future and its implications for huanglongbing management. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 121:155–159.
  31. Unruh, B.L. and J.C. Silvertooth. 1996. Comparisons between an upland and a pima cotton cultivar: II.Nutrient uptake and partitioning. Agron. J. 122:589–595.
  32. Walworth, J.L. and M.E. Sumner. 1975. The Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS), p. 149–188. In: B.A. Stewart (ed.). Advances in soil science, Vol. VI. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  33. Wells, C.E. and D.M. Eissenstat. 2003. Moving beyond the roots of young seedling: The influence of age and branching order on root functions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 21:324–334.