Forest Management in the Interface: Practicing Visible Stewardship
Vol. 2008 No. 6, Historical Fact Sheets
Vol. 2008 No. 6

Forest Management in the Interface: Practicing Visible Stewardship: FOR 177/FR237, rev. 7/2008

Historical Fact Sheets
https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fr237-2008
Published 2008-09-09
Bruce Hull
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Sarah F. Ashton
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Rien M. Visser
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Martha C. Monroe
University of Florida
EDIS Cover Volume 2008 Number 6 Gerbera and researchers image cover
PDF-2008

Keywords

FR237

How to Cite

Hull, Bruce, Sarah F. Ashton, Rien M. Visser, and Martha C. Monroe. 2008. “Forest Management in the Interface: Practicing Visible Stewardship: FOR 177 FR237, Rev. 7 2008”. EDIS 2008 (6). Gainesville, FL. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fr237-2008.
APA Chicago IEEE MLA

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

Revised! FOR-177, a 4-page fact sheet by Bruce Hull, Sarah F. Ashton, Rien M. Visser, and Martha C. Monroe, reviews a suite of visible stewardship options, such as cues-to-care and screening practices that can help improve public perceptions of resource management practices such as timber harvesting. Includes references. Published by the UF School of Forest Resources and Conservation, July 2008.

https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fr237-2008
PDF-2008

References

Hull, R. B.; D. P. Roberston; and G. J. Buhyoff. 2004. "Boutique" forestry: New forest practices in urbanizing landscapes. Journal of Forestry 102(1): 14-19.

Hull, R. B.; D. P. Robertson; G. J. Buhyoff; and A. Kendra. (2000). What are we hiding behind the visual buffer strip? Forest aesthetics reconsidered. Journal of Forestry 98(7): 34-38.

Nassauer, J. I. 1992. The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landscape Ecology 6(4): 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129702

Ribe, R. 2002. Is scenic beauty a proxy for acceptable forest management? The influence of environmental attitudes on environmental perceptions. Environment and Behavior 34(6): 757-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391602237245

SAF. 2002. Clearcutting: A Position of the Society of American Foresters. Bethesda MD: Society of American Foresters, http://www.idahoforests.org/img/pdf/clearcut_SAF_position.pdf (accessed August 1, 2004).

Schauman, S. 1998. The garden and the red barn: The pervasive pastoral and its environmental consequences. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56: 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540_6245.jaac56.2.0181

Shelby, B.; J. A. Tokarczyk; and R. L. Johnson. 2004. Timber harvests and forest neighbors: The urban fringe research project at Oregon State University. Journal of Forestry 102(1): 8-13.

Sheppard, S. 2003. Knowing a socially sustainable forest when you see one: Implications for results-based forestry. The Forestry Chronicle 79(5): 865-875. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc79865-5

Sheppard, S. and H. Harshaw, eds. 2001. Forests and Landscapes: Linking Ecology, Sustainability, and Aesthetics. New York: CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995007.0000

License

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>