Reduced Use of Restricted and Danger-Labeled Pesticides in Florida Fresh Market Tomato Production (1992-2004)
Vol. 2005 No. 15, Historical Fact Sheets
Vol. 2005 No. 15

Reduced Use of Restricted and Danger-Labeled Pesticides in Florida Fresh Market Tomato Production (1992-2004): PI-87/PI124, 11/2005

Historical Fact Sheets
https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-pi124-2005
Published 2005-12-22
Mark A. Mossler
University of Florida
EDIS Cover Volume 2005 Number 15 teacher image
PDF-2005

Keywords

PI124

How to Cite

Mossler, Mark A. 2005. “Reduced Use of Restricted and Danger-Labeled Pesticides in Florida Fresh Market Tomato Production (1992-2004): PI-87 PI124, 11 2005”. EDIS 2005 (15). Gainesville, FL. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-pi124-2005.
APA Chicago IEEE MLA

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

Pesticide use values for 2004 compared to peak usage data for the period 1992 through 2004 demonstrate a 75% reduction in the application of restricted or “Danger”-labeled insecticides in fresh market tomato. Paraquat use was reduced by 31%. Fumigant use (17% reduction) was mainly influenced by rate reduction, rather than reduction of use (1-7). This document is PI-87, one of a series of publications of the Pesticide Information Office, Agronomy Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Published November 2005.

Accessibility Summary:

In accordance with Title II regulations this content meets all points of exemption as Archived web content and/or Preexisting conventional electronic documents.

https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-pi124-2005
PDF-2005

References

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistics Service. (2005). Agricultural Chemical Usage, Vegetables, 2004 Summary. Agricultural Statistics Board, National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistics Service. (2003). Agricultural Chemical Usage, Vegetables, 2002 Summary. Agricultural Statistics Board, National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistics Service. (2001). Agricultural Chemical Usage, Vegetables, 2000 Summary. Agricultural Statistics Board, National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistics Service. (1999). Agricultural Chemical Usage, Vegetables, 1998 Summary. Agricultural Statistics Board, National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistics Service. (1997). Agricultural Chemical Usage, Vegetable Crop Summary 1996. Agricultural Statistics Board, National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistics Service. (1995). Agricultural Chemical Usage, Vegetable Crop Summary

Agricultural Statistics Board, National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture/National Agricultural Statistics Service. (1993). Agricultural Chemical Usage 1992 Vegetables Summary. Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture/Agricultural Marketing Service. Florida specific fresh market tomato analyses obtained from USDA's Pesticide Data Program.

Agricultural Pesticides - Management Improvements Needed to Further Promote Integrated Pest Management. GAO-01-815. August 2001. U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C.

License