The Discovery Adhocracy: Special Collections, Information Resource Management, and Scholarly Communications Departments Partnership

Authors

  • Sarah Godlin Cal Poly Humboldt Library
  • Brianne Hagen Cal Poly Humboldt Library
  • Carly Marino Cal Poly Humboldt Library
  • Kyle Morgan Cal Poly Humboldt Library

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32473/cslp.v1i1.140040

Abstract

The paper will explore how the library’s Special Collections, Information Resource Management, and Scholarly Communications departments are partnering to facilitate campus community publications and digital assets, while centering student voices. We will describe the roles of each department involved in the partnership and provide two case studies of how the partnership works in application. One of the case study publications, Toyon: Seven Decades of Student Driven Publishing, gave students the opportunity to work in research and writing teams to create an open-access book. These professional, paid positions provided experience for students to connect with alumni, conduct research in the archive, author a book, and design the layout. Two of the hired students took their experience with them into publishing-related, full-time positions within the university. The other case study publication, The North Coast Otters and Public Arts Initiative, connected the library’s digital archive with the publication to provide users with multiple images for each piece of artwork. Both works demonstrate the power of using discovery principles to engage readers with both publications and the archive, and are models for future publication and digital asset projects. The collaborations among the three library departments began informally, but coalesced over time into a regularly scheduled working group to address projects involving the entire scholarship cycle from research to authoring to publication to discovery. Besides providing students with opportunities to develop their resumes, the published products capture the history of the university, build connections between the library and the campus, and promote the university and library to the broader community. 

Accessibility Summary:

In accordance with Title II regulations this content meets all points of exemption as Archived web content and/or Preexisting conventional electronic documents.

References

Al-Busaidi, I. S., Wells, C. I., & Wilkinson, T. J. (2019). Publication in a medical student journal predicts short- and long-term academic success: A matched-cohort study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1704-x

GO FAIR International Support and Coordination Office. (n.d.) Fair Principles. Retrieved September 12, 2023, from https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/

Gresty, K. A., & Edwards-Jones, A. (2012). Experiencing research-informed teaching from the student perspective: Insights from developing an undergraduate e-journal. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01156.x

Li, M., Seneca, T., & Young, M. K. (2022). Content and context: A case study of metadata collaboration. International Journal of Librarianship, 7(1), 127-148. https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2022.vol7.1.234

Lindquist, Evert A., & Buttazzoni, Michael (2021). The Ecology of Open Innovation Units: Adhocracy and Competing Values in Public Service Systems. Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1941569

Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Adhocracy. In Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved May 30, 2023, from www.oed.com/view/Entry/247827

Downloads

Published

2023-12-15

How to Cite

Godlin, S., Hagen, B., Marino, C., & Morgan, K. (2023). The Discovery Adhocracy: Special Collections, Information Resource Management, and Scholarly Communications Departments Partnership. Case Studies in Library Publishing, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.32473/cslp.v1i1.140040

Issue

Section

Case Studies