Screening Fecal Methanogens in Five Orders of Mammals

  • Brett R Higgins University of Florida
  • Ann Wilkie University of Florida

Abstract

Animal waste has been studied as a potential fuel source via anaerobic digestion. Feces have also been used to inoculate biodigesters. Biodigesters are a waste treatment solution that use anaerobic digestion to convert organic matter into methane. They utilize microbes to break down organic matter into substrates which are then converted into methane as fuel. The final step’s productivity depends on the methanogen content of the biodigester. This study evaluated the feces of captive animals for use as a methanogenic inoculum. The aim was to assess the potential of different feces for methanogen contribution through a literature review and sample analysis via fluorescence microscopy to observe F420 autofluorescence. Coenzyme F420 is a fluorescent coenzyme involved in redox reactions in methanogens and is used in their identification and observation. The samples were from herbivores in the orders Rodentia (rodents), Lagomorpha (rabbits), Perissodactyla (odd-toed ungulates), Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates), and Diprotodontia (some marsupials). The literature review favored goats and sheep over the other animals in the study. The feces from each animal species tested were observed to have some methanogen presence, but the levels were low and differences were not discernible. Overall, the results of the sample analyses were inconclusive due to the scarcity of methanogens and obscuration due to foliage fragments.

            Keywords: Fecal, Methanogens, Coenzyme F420, Anaerobic digestion, Biodigester, Inoculum

Author Biographies

Brett R Higgins, University of Florida
Undergraduate Student in Microbiology and Zoology.
Ann Wilkie, University of Florida
Siol and Water Sciences, Research Professor, Bioenergy and Sustainable Technology

References

Cornejo, C., & Wilkie, A. C. (2010). Greenhouse gas emissions and biogas potential from livestock in Ecuador. Energy for Sustainable Development, 14(4), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2010.09.008

Doddema, H. J., & Vogels, G. D. (1978). Improved identification of methanogenic bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Applied and environmental microbiology, 36(5), 752-4.

Hackstein, J. H. P., & van Alen, T. A. (1996). FECAL METHANOGENS AND VERTEBRATE EVOLUTION. Evolution, 50(2), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03868.x

Lamendella, R., Santo Domingo, J. W., Ghosh, S., Martinson, J., & Oerther, D. B. (2011). Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut. BMC Microbiology, 11(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-103

Sorlini, C., Brusa, T., Ranalli, G., & Ferrari, A. (1988). Quantitative determination of methanogenic bacteria in the feces of different mammals. Current Microbiology, 17(1), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01568816

St-Pierre, B., & Wright, A.-D. G. (2012). Diversity of gut methanogens in herbivorous animals. Animal, 7(s1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731112000912

St-Pierre, B., & Wright, A.-D. G. (2012). Molecular analysis of methanogenic archaea in the forestomach of the alpaca (Vicugna pacos). BMC Microbiology, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-1

Sun, L., Pope, P. B., Eijsink, V. G. H., & Schnürer, A. (2015). Characterization of microbial community structure during continuous anaerobic digestion of straw and cow manure. Microbial Biotechnology, 8(5), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12298

Published
2019-12-05