Implicit Attitudes Toward Foreign Accents
Over the past 20 years, the Implicit Attitude Test (IAT) has become a robust paradigm for evaluating unconscious biases about socially sensitive topics (implicit attitudes) in a way that avoids social desirability bias. It has been widely applied to the psychology surrounding race, gender, and other social characteristics, and is a potentially useful tool for linguists particularly in studying the effects of dialect and accent. This study demonstrates an application of the IAT to accents, particularly examining implicit attitudes about Chinese accented English relative to Standard American English. The study evaluated participants’ implicit attitudes about Chinese accents using the IAT, measured their explicit attitudes using the Speech Evaluation Instrument (SEI) developed by Zahn and Hopper (1985), and recorded self-reported rates of exposure to Chinese accents. It found that participants had both implicit and explicit attitudes toward Chinese accented English that were significantly negative relative to American English. It did not, however, find a correlation between participants’ explicit and implicit attitudes. There was a weak correlation between implicit attitudes and self-reported rates of exposure to Chinese accents, although the interpretation of this finding is unclear.
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2012). The Implicit Association Test and sociolinguistic meaning. Lingua,122(7), 753-763. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2012.01.002
Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2016). The development of implicit gender attitudes. Developmental Science, 19(5), 781–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12321
Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S.C. (2002). ”Predictive Validity of an Implicit Association Test for Assessing Anxiety", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (6): 1441–1455, doi:10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.521
Friese M, Smith CT, Plischke T, Bluemke M, Nosek BA (2012) Do Implicit Attitudes Predict Actual Voting Behavior Particularly for Undecided Voters?. PLOS ONE 7(8): e44130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044130
Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, M. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.206
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. J. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. doi:10.1037/a0015575.
Gregg, A. P., & Klymowsky, J. (2013). The Implicit Association Test in market research: Potentials and pitfalls. Psychology & Marketing, 30(7), 588-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.20630
Haider, A. H., Schneider, E. B., Sriram, N., Scott, V. K., Swoboda, S. M., Zogg, C. K., … Cooper, L. A. (2015). Original scientific article: Unconscious
Race and Class Biases among Registered Nurses: Vignette-Based Study Using Implicit Association Testing. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 220, 1077–1086.e3.
Ksiazkiewicz, A., & Hedrick, J. (2013). An Introduction to Implicit Attitudes in Political Science Research. PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(3), 525-531. doi:10.1017/S1049096513000632
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940-967. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067).
Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271418
Pantos, A. J., & Perkins, A. W. (2012). Measuring Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Foreign Accented Speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(1), 3-20.
Pirutinsky, S., Carp, S., & Rosmarin, D. H. (2017). A Paradigm to Assess Implicit Attitudes towards God: The Positive/Negative God Associations Task. Journal Of Religion And Health, 56(1), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0303-y
Rosseel, L., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D. (2018). Measuring language attitudes using the Personalized Implicit Association Test: A case study on regional varieties of Dutch in Belgium. Journal of Linguistic Geography, 6(1), 20-39. doi:10.1017/jlg.2018.3
Westgate, E. C., Riskind, R. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Implicit preferences for straight people over lesbian women and gay men weakened from 2006 to 2013. Collabra, 1. doi:10.1525/collabra.18
Zahn, C. J., & Hopper, R. (1985). Measuring Language Attitudes: The Speech Evaluation Instrument. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8500400203
Copyright (c) 2019 Joshua Daniels
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Some journals stipulate that submitted articles cannot be under consideration for publication or published in another journal. The student-author and mentor have the option of determining which journal the paper will be submitted to first. UF JUR accepts papers that have been published in other journals or might be published in the future. It is the responsibility of the student-author and mentor to determine whether another journal will accept a paper that has been published in UF JUR.