The Evolution of International Maritime Law Amid Geopolitical Conflicts

Abstract

This paper examines the evolving framework of international maritime law in the context of rising geopolitical tensions. By exploring key case studies-specifically, China’s claims in the South China Sea, Arctic sovereignty disputes, and critical chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz, the Bab-el- Mandeb, and the Suez Canal--this analysis highlights the intricate relationship between state actions and legal principles in contested maritime regions. The paper is organized to provide insights into the historical development of maritime law before and after World War II, emphasizing significant legislative and judicial milestones that have shaped contemporary practices. Through a critical analysis of regional conflicts and their implications for global stability, this study argues that the evolution of maritime law reflects geopolitical dynamics and serves as a vital framework for fostering international cooperation. The findings underscore the necessity of collaborative efforts among nations to navigate shared maritime challenges and enhance security in an increasingly contentious global landscape.