Establishing a National Framework for Volunteer Arts Practice in Prisons: Aotearoa
New Zealand’s Arts in Corrections Educator Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33009/fsop_ijci140421Keywords:
arts education, corrections, rehabilitation, cultural safety, Māori frameworks, volunteer agenciesAbstract
This article explores the establishment of a national framework for volunteer arts practitioners working in Aotearoa New Zealand prisons through the Arts in Corrections Educator (AICE) course, developed by Arts Access Aotearoa. The course operationalises Hōkai Rangi (Ara Poutama Aotearoa Department of Corrections, 2023), the Department’s strategy to improve wellbeing and cultural connection, and builds on Te Ara ki Runga (Arts Access Aotearoa, 2024), a best-practice guide for arts educators in correctional settings. The article situates this work within international research on arts and rehabilitation, which recognises that “creative expression in prisons can transform perception, behaviour, and identity” (Brewster, 2014). It shows how a culturally grounded and trauma-informed training model enhances programme quality, practitioner safety, and long-term sustainability.
Drawing on evidence that the arts foster empathy, reflection, and desistance from offending (Cheliotis, 2014; Woodland, 2021), the paper presents the AICE course as a replicable model for integrating cultural competence and ethical structure into prison arts practice.
The findings illustrate that the combination of a national strategy, a practical guide, and structured educator training can bridge the gap between creative potential and correctional safety. For an international audience, the AICE model demonstrates that professionalising volunteer practice while respecting Indigenous knowledge can lead to meaningful and sustainable rehabilitation through the arts.
References
Ara Poutama Aotearoa Department of Corrections. (2023). Hōkai Rangi Refresh: Ara Poutama Aotearoa strategy 2019– 2024. Wellington, New Zealand: Ara Poutama Aotearoa.
Arts Access Aotearoa. (2024). Te Ara ki Runga: The Path Up—A best-practice guide for Arts in Corrections educators. Wellington, New Zealand: Arts Access Aotearoa | Putanga Toi ki Aotearoa.
Brewster, L. (2014). The impact of prison arts programs on inmate attitudes and behavior: A quantitative evaluation. Justice Policy Journal, 11(2).
Cheliotis, L. & Jordanoska, A. (2015). The Arts of Desistance: Assessing the Role of Arts-based Programmes in Reducing Reoffending. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12154
Cleveland, W. (2000). Art in other places: Artists at work in America’s community and social institutions. Praeger Publishers.
Gussak, D. E. (2006). Effects of art therapy with prison inmates: A follow-up study. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 33, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2005.11.003
Gussak, D. E. (2007). The effectiveness of art therapy in reducing depression in prison populations. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 33(4), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X06294137
Hazou, R., & Daniels, K. (2022). Theatre as rehabilitation: Creative practice and cultural responsiveness in New Zealand prisons. Performance Research, 27(5), 45–59.
Johnson, L. M. (2008). A place for art in prison: Art as a tool for rehabilitation and management. The Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 5(2), 100–120.
Machost, H. & Stains, M. (2023), Reflective practices in education: A primer for practitioners. CBE—Life Sciences Education 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-07-0148
Point & Associates. (2025). The creative arts and cultural wellbeing prison initiative evaluation. Ara Poutama Aotearoa Department of Corrections. Te Tiriti o Waitangi | The Treaty of Waitangi. (1840). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Government. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/treaty-of-waitangi
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Neil Wallace

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.